Michigan has outrecruited PSU in 7 out of the last 10 based on which site? It appears to be close to even during that time. Not to mention, IMO, PSU has put out FAR better players in the NFL than Hairball has during his time -- even more of an indictment about not reaching the heights that we should have. On a separate point, so even if Michigan has slightly been better in recruiting (which I think is negligible) that means we shouldn't be able to rise up and play better -- to be able to win these big games against them? There are so many examples in every CFB season of teams beating others who might have more talent -- and in TAMU, Miami, and a plethora of other cases, teams with great recruiting numbers who lose to garbage annually. But, this idea that we shouldn't be beating Michigan more b/c of recruiting is ridiculous...the numbers I bet are so close averaging the stars, so to speak. And, as we all know, recruiting *stars are many times subjective and biased. We can simply tell by watching the games, which team has better players at certain positions, etc. If you look back at JF's games vs JH, simply based on players on the field, there aren't many positions you would take JH's guys over ours -- except where it really matters, the LOS. Hence, why PSU is stuck in a rut annually.