There's a reason why demand for HEVs (traditional hybrids) have been surging.
Depending on your driving pattern and local gas prices, should recoup the initial extra $1k-2k cost over a 2-3 year period.
PHEVs cost considerably more, so unless eligible for the IRA credit, doesn't make much financial sense, and unlike most HEVs, tend to be less reliable due to basically having 2 separate powertrains.
But if can get a great deal on ICE, that may be the most prudent financial move.
I was shocked to see, in the report I linked above, that Mercedes, Subaru, Audi and Honda were all ranked worse than average. This is especially true of Audi. I've never owned an Audi and was set to buy a Q5 until my wife and I test-drove it. We weren't 100 yards away when my wife said "Nope". We ended up getting the MB GLB250.
Honda and Acura went through a rough period as they introduced numerous new powertrains/powertrain components, but have since been climbing back up (more Honda than Acura) as they work out the kinks.
While not yet reflected in the rankings, Toyota/Lexus have been having issues with newer models, including needing to do engine replacements.
The key isn't so much which automaker/brand, but to know what components (engines, transmissions, etc) to stay away from.
The CX-5 is reliable because its engine/transmission has been around for a long time.
That's generally how Toyota and Buick have tended to do well in reliability rankings - keeping powertrains around for a long time.
And oh, BEV range also gets reduced significantly by extreme heat (not to mention AC use) which is becoming more common in certain areas of the country (that's why coastal California is just about prime climate for BEVs).