I don't think the math says much. Assuming Iowa does not crap the bed, ala NC State last year, and they are in a tight race for second the most likely competition for that spot is OK State. The B1G dropping a qualifier has no meaningful effect there. The most likely in conference challenge comes from the three headed monster of Nebraska, Minnesota, and Ohio State (they are cheek by jowl in my projections). With those three teams holding #2, #3, and #5 in Roars seeds it is certainly possible that one of them could fail to qualify a wrestler in a reduced B1G allocation scenario. But the odds of two or more not qualifying seems meaningfully tiny.With Nelson Brands in and Patrick Kennedy out, would that mean one less auto-qualification spot for the B1G at 174?
Could this change theoretically provide a small net points gain for Iowa vs other competition, by weakening the bracket, assuming Nelson earns one?
If so, could Nelson Brands at B1G more strategery by the Iowa coaching staff, if every point counts?
What does the maths say?
If Pinto or Kharchla finish outside the qualifying spot they will almost assuredly get at-large bids. Whiting not 100% sure but would have a good chance depending on what happens at other conference tournaments.I don't think the math says much. Assuming Iowa does not crap the bed, ala NC State last year, and they are in a tight race for second the most likely competition for that spot is OK State. The B1G dropping a qualifier has no meaningful effect there. The most likely in conference challenge comes from the three headed monster of Nebraska, Minnesota, and Ohio State (they are cheek by jowl in my projections). With those three teams holding #2, #3, and #5 in Roars seeds it is certainly possible that one of them could fail to qualify a wrestler in a reduced B1G allocation scenario. But the odds of two or more not qualifying seems meaningfully tiny.
Footnote: The British choice of maths makes sense if you squint. Sure we call physics physics. Fine. But it used to drive me bonkers when they would say Goldmans or Merrills when referring to Goldman Sachs or Merrill Lynch. There is only one of each. And now there isn't even that.
Where is Luke Condon/WIS ?Halfway home, after posting 174 below. So far, 149, 125, 141, 197, and now 174, in that order have released. I think 133 shall be next!
174 Pounds
#1 Levi Haines (PSU, 8-0)
#2 Carson Kharchla (tOSU, 7-1)
#3 Lenny Pinto (NEB, 7-1)
#4 Patrick Kennedy (IA, 4-3)
#5 Clayton Whiting (MINN, 5-3)
#6 Jackson Turley (RUT, 3-4)
#7 Dan Braunagel (ILL, 4-4)
#8 Brody Baumann (PUR, 3-5)
#9 John Branson (MD, 2-6)
#10 Joseph Walker (MICH, 2-5)
The rest: Caesar Garza (MSU, 3-5), Roman Rogotzke (IND, 0-2), Joseph Martin (NU, 0-0) or Aiden Vandenbush (NU, 0-8)
Up two weight classes from last season, my #1 seed for 2024 at 157 pounds is also my #1 seed this season at 174 pounds. #1 Levi Haines (PSU) does have a blemish this season, to fellow national champ Keeghan O’Toole of Missouri in Sudden Victory, but has not lost in conference duals. In conference, Haines has easily outdistanced the field by beating my #2, #3, #4, #6 and #7 seeds. On Haines’ heels (not really) are two guys who only have the one loss already mentioned; #2 Carson Kharchla (tOSU) and #3 Lenny Pinto (NEB). Little, and I mean VERY little separates Kharchla and Pinto this season. Both beat #4 Patrick Kennedy (IA) and #5 Clayton Whiting (MINN) HTH in conference and their records are an identical 7-1. Keep digging I said, and discovered that Kharchla also beat my #6, #7, and #8 wrestler while Pinto wrestled a schedule that was half a notch easier. That is not much to go on, as both guys beat everyone in front of them except for Haines, but it is all I have. Besides, assuming the seeds hold, it will be Kharchla vs Pinto in the semifinals, and as it should be, so if they meet it can be settles on the mat, with the winner reaching the finals. #4 Kennedy beat the guys he was supposed to, and his only losses are to the three guys in front of him. Here it gets tougher to seed, with a gap in talent after the #4 seed. #5 Clayton Whiting (MINN) has good wins against middle-of-the-pack guys Jackson Turley (RUT) and Brody Baumann (PUR), and only losses to three of the four guys in front of him. I’m going #6 Turley next, but do not feel great about it. The sixth year senior has a HTH win over #7 Dan Braunagel (ILL), which carried the day, but he also has an inexplicable loss to John Branson (MD), a true freshman with a 2-6 conference record. #8 Baumann is the best of the rest in a weight class that is the Big Ten’s least talented top-to-bottom in my opinion. Indiana’s Derek Gilcher would have slotted before Baumann, beating him HTH, but it appears Roman Rogotzke is now the Hoosiers’ starter. #9 goes to Branson while it is #10 Joseph Walker (MICH) finishing the top 10.
1. If Brands goes in the postseason, then yes.With Nelson Brands in and Patrick Kennedy out, would that mean one less auto-qualification spot for the B1G at 174?
Could this change theoretically provide a small net points gain for Iowa vs other competition, by weakening the bracket, assuming Nelson earns one?
If so, could Nelson Brands at B1G be more strategery by the Iowa coaching staff, if every point counts?
What does the maths say?
Brands could make a 2 match run on the back side.1. If Brands goes in the postseason, then yes.
2. At B10s? Nobody cares.
At NCAAs, this could hurt Iowa -- Brands would get a low seed with a tough opener. Certainly a much worse draw than Kennedy would get.
Remember, they can't switch names after B10s.
3. Lol
Such a move only makes sense if Iowa thinks Brands - who scores no bonus -- can go deeper into NCAAs than Kennedy despite a much lower seed.
2. At B10s? Nobody cares.
At NCAAs, this could hurt Iowa -- Brands would get a low seed with a tough opener. Certainly a much worse draw than Kennedy would get.
Remember, they can't switch names after B10s.
Iowa fans clamoring for Brands are basing it on 2023 when he finished 5th. He beat Faison from NC State in the first round and then beat 6 seed Ethan Smith of Ohio St to make the quarters. Lost to Mekhi Lewis and then beat Ed Ruth and Peyton Mocco, lost to Chris Foca and then beat Plott for 5th. I don't see him making a run like that again. Also, I see Kennedy as a far better bonus option, especially on the back side. I guess we will see.Brands could make a 2 match run on the back side.
Sounds like a bout with bad Mex.Brands could make a 2 match run on the back side.
Beat Ed Ruth? LOL.Iowa fans clamoring for Brands are basing it on 2023 when he finished 5th. He beat Faison from NC State in the first round and then beat 6 seed Ethan Smith of Ohio St to make the quarters. Lost to Mekhi Lewis and then beat Ed Ruth and Peyton Mocco, lost to Chris Foca and then beat Plott for 5th. I don't see him making a run like that again. Also, I see Kennedy as a far better bonus option, especially on the back side. I guess we will see.
LOL! I did not. I meant Edmond Ruth.Beat Ed Ruth? LOL.
Guessing you did that on purpose?
No, he meant to say Peyton Manning.Beat Ed Ruth? LOL.
Guessing you did that on purpose?
He is there now. I rewrote that section and edited the original post.Where is Luke Condon/WIS ?
Sorry if asked and answered, but would Brands getting the nod over PK for Philly, and darling boy Arnold getting it next year for 174 send PK hurtling through the portal?Iowa fans clamoring for Brands are basing it on 2023 when he finished 5th. He beat Faison from NC State in the first round and then beat 6 seed Ethan Smith of Ohio St to make the quarters. Lost to Mekhi Lewis and then beat Ed Ruth and Peyton Mocco, lost to Chris Foca and then beat Plott for 5th. I don't see him making a run like that again. Also, I see Kennedy as a far better bonus option, especially on the back side. I guess we will see.
I would expect Iowa to enter Kennedy into the coaches rankings for allocation. Brands can still wrestle at big 10s but he wouldn't allocate anyway. So you enter Kennedy just in case he is the guy since he will earnTo momentarily take Brands 174 Postaeason seriously: he would be a real outlier for NCAA seeding:
- Low/no ranking
- Win % around 65% after the conference tourney
- No RPI
- No regular season Quality Wins
- TBD conference placement but he's not making the finals
These guys happen very infrequently.
In 2024, the only somewhat comparable was Missouri 133 Kade Moore, who was 11-5 and thus did have an RPI. He went 1-2 at B12s but beat Latona and Basile in the regular season. He was the 26 seed.
The only 2023 comparable was Teske: 9-4, no regular seaaon QWs, 7th at B10s. He got the 23.
Meanwhile, Kennedy would likely be around the 8 seed. He's 8th in the poll, projected 10th RPI, and has about 5 QWs so far.
Theoretically, then, if Jaxon beats Arnold at B1Gs and Gabe goes opposite-bracket from Carter in Philly, the vision quest match never happens?184 Pounds
#1 Carter Starocci (PSU, 8-0)
#2 Max McEnelly (MINN, 8-0)
#3 Silas Allred (NEB, 5-2)
#4 Gabe Arnold (IA, 5-2)
#5 Jaxon Smith (MD, 6-2)
Theoretically, then, if Jaxon beats Arnold at B1Gs and Gabe goes opposite-bracket from Carter in Philly, the vision quest match never happens?
11-6, 13-8, 22-8, 14-8, and 11-6, Washington's records, in order from his RSFR season to this season. Did injuries or something else hamper his wrestling development? 22-8 is pretty good, only a bit better than average since. TF if it happens, my guess.Another Carter vs Washington match in the quarters?
The longer you hang around the smarter you seem to be getting. I can tell because you and I agree more often.Iowa fans clamoring for Brands are basing it on 2023 when he finished 5th. He beat Faison from NC State in the first round and then beat 6 seed Ethan Smith of Ohio St to make the quarters. Lost to Mekhi Lewis and then beat Ed Ruth and Peyton Mocco, lost to Chris Foca and then beat Plott for 5th. I don't see him making a run like that again. Also, I see Kennedy as a far better bonus option, especially on the back side. I guess we will see.
Thought that was Paintin Manning.No, he meant to say Peyton Manning.
Cut that meat!Thought that was Paintin Manning.
100% agree. Bartlett is going to have a helluva match with either wrestler. Both very very good.Agreed.
A 1-loss B10 champ cannot beat out Alirez for the 1, according to NCAA seeding math.
But Alirez has a low RPI and few Quality Wins. He cannot be the 1 ahead of an unbeaten B10 champ.
Be undefeated, lock in the 1, and let those 2 face each other.
no chance at title so it makes no diff!1. If Brands goes in the postseason, then yes.
2. At B10s? Nobody cares.
At NCAAs, this could hurt Iowa -- Brands would get a low seed with a tough opener. Certainly a much worse draw than Kennedy would get.
Remember, they can't switch names after B10s.
3. Lol
Such a move only makes sense if Iowa thinks Brands - who scores no bonus -- can go deeper into NCAAs than Kennedy despite a much lower seed.
You have Teemer #2, Taylor #3 in the list and the opposite in the explanation.My last, and longest review. 157 finishes a labor of love for me and it was a doozy. I got a bit verbose with my explanations, so I'll apologize for that. It was worth the extra time and extensive write-up as I tried to put into words all the angles I looked at in doing the seeds.
I do have one more post, and that is a quick look at the team race, AND a look at next season, mostly about departures due to expired eligibility.
157 Pounds
#1 Tyler Kasak (PSU, 5-1)
#2 Jacori Teemer (IA, 2-1)
#3 Antrell Taylor (NEB, 6-1)
#4 Ethen Miller (MD, 7-0)
#5 Joey Blaze (PUR, 5-1)
#6 Tommy Askey (MINN, 6-2)
#7 Trevor Chumbley (NU, 5-1)
#8 Conner Harer (RUT, 4-4)
#9 Jason Kraisser (ILL, 4-4)
#10 Chase Saldate (MICH, 2-3)
#11 Brandon Cannon (tOSU, 2-1)
The rest: Luke Melcher (WIS, 2-6), Braden Stauffenberg (MSU, 1-5), Ryan Garvick (IND, 1-7)
I suspect some of you have been waiting for my 157 seeds and are ready to pounce. This weight class has a lot of talent at the top, but is a mess to seed. The drama includes an undefeated wrestler with a weak resume, and a wrestler that is 2-1 in conference and once-upon-a-time was number one in the country. First the Ethen Miller (MD) story. Miller is “officially” 8-0 in conference action, a noteworthy achievement for any wrestler. One of his “official” wins is an Injury Default victory against Tyler Kasak (PSU) in a bout that was 1-0 Kasak, in essence tied, at the time Kasak left the mat in the second period for concussion protocol and did not return. Kasak was #1 in the country and had his sights on an undefeated conference record after beating Jacori Teemer (IA) the weekend prior and Antrell Taylor (NEB) in mid-January. It is always best to have seeds determined by results on the mat, and it looked like we would have a key bout result when the Kasak vs Miller bout ended, except that it ended before going the distance. We will see how the Big Ten handles the result. My logic in handling this situation is below.
Then there is the Jacori Teemer (IA), where the Hawkeye is 2-1 in conference, having lost to Kasak, but has a good win against Tommy Askey (MINN) to go with a win vs Sammy Sasso (tOSU).
Both situations deserved careful consideration. After doing my homework, I settled on #1 Kasak, #2 Antrell Taylor (NEB), #3 Teemer, and #4 Miller. Let me explain, as it is sure to upset some folks, though there is always method to my madness!! #1 Kasak has, by far, the two best conference wins of any 157 pound wrestler in the Big Ten, against Teemer (when he was #1) and Taylor (who has only this one conference loss). I am discounting the Miller loss for Kasak a little as the bout never finished. I wish it had, it would make these seeds cleaner. In the end Kasak’s resume stands out in conference action, significantly so. The next best wins in conference belong to Taylor and Teemer, both over my #5 Askey, and both settled late in regulation or in Sudden Victory. They are Askey’s only losses on his solid season. I was on the fence for whom, of Taylor and Teemer I would give the higher seed, but the Joey Blaze (PUR) win for Taylor settled it. It is #2 Taylor and #3 Teemer. As far as Teemer and the limited conference action, I didn’t penalize the Hawkeye too much. Lack of action is sometimes a factor, but being prudent is important too. Teemer’s HTH win against 6-2 Askey is evidence enough that he belongs near the top, though I’ll admit that if this bout didn’t happen there would have been no choice but to move the Hawkeye down the seeds. The “prudent” mention above is reference to the fact that penalizing Teemer solely for his lack of action, ignoring the Askey, and moving his seed lower, would impact higher seeds that would see him earlier in the tournament. I wanted to avoid that.
At #4, Miller has had a great season, no doubt. In fact he is undefeated in ALL collegiate action this year, which is noteworthy. I’m not sure, in 15 years of doing my seeding review, that I’ve ever had an undefeated guy that’s wrestled at least seven conference duals seeded this low. His problem is; Harer, Estrada, Kraisser, Mechler, Stauffenberg, and Saldate. Not a who’s who of high seeds in the Big Ten, none having a winning record in conference, and their combined record in conference is 15-25. None will be seeded higher than 8th when I’m done this weight class, and the top three guys have resumes better than Miller’s imo. True also that Miller beat Blaze HTH at the Tiger Style Invite early in the season, but Blaze has a similar resume. Only Sasso on the list of wins for Blaze jumps out at me as familiar, as his other wins are; Kraisser, Garvick, Bostelman and Schork. As much as it gives me goosebumps to see Sammy Sasso on the mat, he is not the same wrestler as before the horrific shooting he suffered through (It was recently announced that he will not be the Buckeyes starter for the post-season). Not Miller’s fault certainly as a wrestler can only take on the guy in front of them. But facts are facts, and a single win from among the top guys in conference action would have gone a long way to a higher seed. #5 Joey Blaze (PUR) has also had a fine season record-wise, but is without a single noteworthy win AND the already-noted loss HTH to Miller early in the season. Maybe that is why Miller didn’t wrestle Blaze at the Purdue-Maryland Dual late in the season! #6 Askey slots next, ahead of #7 Trevor Chumbley (NU), whom he beat HTH.
The remaining several wrestlers did not stand out to me, so again my dive was deeper. Chase Saldate (MICH), who gave Levi Haines all he could handle last season while wrestling for Michigan State, is 2-3 and without a notable win. Conner Harer (RUT) and Jason Kraisser (ILL) both wrestled in all of their Big Ten duals, and were 4-4. I found my nugget in #8 Harer’s win column, beating #9 Kraisser HTH. Next I have #10 Saldate, but mark my word, the Big Ten WILL seed him higher (just my spidey senses tingling!). He doesn’t deserve anything higher than #9 to my way of thinking. #11 is Brandon Cannon (tOSU) with a 2-1 record, and recently taking over the starting nod from Sammy Sasso. I do think the Buckeye will far exceed his seed and make the NCAA Championships.
Fixed...thanksYou have Teemer #2, Taylor #3 in the list and the opposite in the explanation.
My work, my seeds. Nothing more, nothing less. I know too much about the seeding process for Big Ten's to give an opinion on what they will be. Pretty sure Mesenbrink will be the #1 seed at 165 though 😀.Thanks for your great work on these, Roar. Are these rankings what you think they should be or what you think they will be? Because I have little doubt Miller’s going to get the 1 and Tyler the 2.
Thats clear as mud. What the hell are you talking about? You can't enter one guy at B1Gs then wrestle the other guy at Nationals.I would expect Iowa to enter Kennedy into the coaches rankings for allocation. Brands can still wrestle at big 10s but he wouldn't allocate anyway. So you enter Kennedy just in case he is the guy since he will earn
No, Corby means that the coaches need to provide a list of intended postseason starters to the NCAA before conference auto-qualifier counts are allotted. That does not need to be the actual starter, but then ...Thats clear as mud. What the hell are you talking about? You can't enter one guy at B1Gs then wrestle the other guy at Nationals.
Isn't that what happened with Teske and Schriever last year? they put the wrong one in and didn't get the allocationNo, Corby means that the coaches need to provide a list of intended postseason starters to the NCAA before conference auto-qualifier counts are allotted. That does not need to be the actual starter, but then ...
A) If Iowa tells NCAA today it's Brands, then B10 loses 1 auto-qualifier spot today (that Kennedy would've met). It might be given to another conference, or it might go directly into the at-large pool, depending on selection math.
B) If Iowa says Kennedy today, but weighs in Brands, then B10 loses that spot at weigh-ins, and it must go to the at-large pool. No real change from (A) from an Iowa or B10 perspective.
C) If Iowa says Brands today but weighs in Kennedy, B10 does not get back the auto-qualifier it would've received if Kennedy were named today.
In theory this would hurt Iowa -- but in reality, Kennedy would likely qualify at B10s and would be a near-lock for an at-large if he somehow didn't. So really, this is juat a dick move that would screw over some other conference 174.
So Iowa should declare Kennedy the starter before the allocation deadline, unless Brands is absolutely going. No big deal if they change their minds at B10 weigh-ins.