You're out of your depth here, guy. It was a clear and straightforward analogy. No straw man was used. Stop being silly. You're just embarrassing yourself.
The issue was what to do in the face of what you believe is inappropriate content. The one poster suggested you ignore it. Since the poster believes it's against the rules (like posting pornography), there's no reason to just ignore it - instead, just argue for enforcement of the rules.
I'll also give you a pro tip, free of charge, when it comes to the art of argumentation ... when constructing an analogy, the strongest examples are the ones that are the MOST dissimilar, except for where they align for the sake of the argument. By taking away any other logical connections, you best highlight the logical connection you're trying to illustrate.