ADVERTISEMENT

TOYOTA drives BIG HOLE in Heim's story

Bruce Heim's statements about The Second Mile's role in the Sandusky had holes so big that you could drive a -- TOYOTA -- through them!

By

Ray Blehar

Yesterday, the Pittsburgh Post Gazette reported Bruce Heim's response to the controversy over his participation in Saturday's coin toss at the Penn State - Army game.

It comes as no surprise that Heim skirted his charity's culpability in the matter by hanging his hat on the fact the charity has yet to be charged in the Sandusky matter. However, that by no means is proof the charity did nothing wrong.

The evidence tells quite a different story than Mr. Heim:

http://notpsu.blogspot.com/2015/10/toyota-drives-big-hole-in-heims.html

Heim issue illustrative of another problem...

A few things to notice:

Ruckus was raised about Heim, numerous outlets notified. And YET, only one that I know of thus far in the MSM, bothered to do a story (PPG). Anyone else notice the collective silence of the local media?

Nothing from CDT/SC.com/PennLive/WTAJ/WJAC ... not a peep. They focused on the bright, shiny object (Beaver Stadium news) and ignored this. Why? Hmmmm. Was it threats from Heim, or PSU (Larry Lokman). Another reason why the truth is so elusive in this issue is the complicity of the local media either hiding the issue or missing it entirely. Would love to know if the stadium issues were planned to be aired yesterday or if it was moved up to obscure the Heim ruckus.

And, finally, for those of you worried about appearances for booing Heim, it won't be aired by ESPN as it will likely be at commercial. And even it is was, why should we care? They played a part in burning down our house. Eff them. And EVEN IF someone makes an issue, let's make sure our social media gurus are out in force saying "they weren't booing the Army, they were booing a man perhaps directly responsible for enabling Sandusky." That should either stop the complaints cold or, better yet, spawn questions about Heim in actual responsible members of the media (if there are any left).

Why Larry Johnson was Great

The recent talk of Saquon Barkley and comparisons to former RB's got me thinking of LJ, whose style I recall being very different than Barkley's. I don't have the sharpest eye for football talent, but I remember being surprised LJ was drafted so high. Of course, his NFL success proved me wrong. I recall thinking that LJ didn't MOVE like a running back. He didn't have the shiftiness that Barkley has. Of course, he was very hard to tackle, and I believe his straight-line speed was deceiving, maybe because he was a long strider. He may have also benefited form great offensive lines, both at PSU and KC. I am curious how others evaluate LJ as a running back.
  • Like
Reactions: jroman1

"McGettigan made a point to say he does not condemn Penn State University... for what Sandusky did."

Special ed attorney, Sandusky prosecutor lecture on bullying, sexual abuse at King’s
First Posted: 10:41 pm - September 29th, 2015 - 129 Views
By Matt Mattei - mmattei@timesleader.com

web1_McGettin2.jpg


WILKES-BARRE — The resounding message when a special education attorney and the lead prosecutor in the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse case spoke at King’s College Tuesday night was that awareness goes a long way in dealing with bullying and child abuse.

Heather Hulse and Joseph McGettigan, of McAndrews Law Offices in Berwyn, gave presentations on those matters in the Burke Auditorium of the McGowan Business School. The seminar was presented by the college and the Court Appointed Special Advocates for Children of Luzerne County.

Hulse, a special education attorney for 17 years, explained that children with special needs are often the targets of bullying in her lecture entitled “Bullying 101: Know Your Rights and How to Protect Your Child.”

Hulse led off the lecture with a statistic that 160,000 students miss school every day due to fear that they’ll be attacked or intimidated by another student. She then highlighted the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act or IDEA of 2004, which requires all students covered by the statute to be provided with a “free, appropriate public education” in the least restrictive environment.

The act mandates that institutions investigate and enact discipline for reported instances of bullying, but it also asserts that the schools may — but are not required to — take preventative action, which Hulse said worries her. “We’ve had to force the school districts to address the bullying,” Hulse said.

Getting the word out

Hulse preached the importance of spreading information to schools, victims and even bullies in addressing a situation of abuse. She explained that for many students who are being bullied, measures can be taken to move them to another district or to consider private school.

“(Their school) is no longer safe for them,” Hulse said. She noted that in many cases, there are funds set up to help parents of victims with tuition for a private school or to afford socialization counseling, for children who have autism or Asperger’s disease, to prevent further bullying.

Hulse also presented a list of signs that a child is being bullied or is bullying another child that parents should be aware of.

Signs of bullied children include difficulty sleeping, declining interest in school, sudden loss of friends or avoidance of social situations, decreased self-esteem and self-destructive tendencies. Hulse said parents should communicate with the school, being vigilant about documenting their complaint in writing, and that schools should do things as simple as separate a child from a bully physically, encourage a positive circle of friends for a child and encourage other students to stand up for their peers.

In addition, parents can seek self-advocacy counseling to help their children stand up for themselves.

Signs of a bully

Signs that a child might be a bully include being quick to blame others and unwilling to accept responsibility, lacking empathy and compassion, having immature social and interpersonal skills and wanting to be in control.

“Bullying is a learned behavior,” Hulse said. “We can unlearn it.” She went on to note that parents of bullies often have no idea what their child is doing and that bullies are often just as much in need of help as victims.

Another thing Hulse stressed was training for teachers, who often do not see bullying as it does not always occur in the classroom. “Teachers need to be aware that it’s happening outside the classroom and to be on guard.”

Hulse passed the floor to McGettigan, the lead prosecutor in the Sandusky sexual abuse trial, and he proceeded with his lecture on “How to be a Leader in Preventing Child Abuse: The Prosecution of Jerry Sandusky.”

Convicted in June 2012 of sexually abusing 10 pre-teen and teenage boys, Sandusky, a former Penn State defensive football coach under Joe Paterno, was sentenced to 30 to 60 years in prison.

The animated, long-time criminal prosecutor applauded the work of his colleague, noting that her civil arena allows for her to help people in proactive ways where for many years, he could only put offenders in jail.

Similar indicators

“The indicators of sexual abuse are not that different from the indicators of bullying,” McGettigan said. He explained that the victims of the Sandusky case numbered in the dozens if not into the hundreds, and that a predator like Sandusky operated in ways McGettigan called “insidious, clever, even Machiavellian,” targeting children of single mothers who did not have a father figure in their lives.

He described Sandusky’s method as “grooming” his victims, meaning he would introduce intimate touches so slowly that children would become accustomed to him to the point that he could prey on them. In this way, McGettigan noted, children were unaware of the wrongfulness of what was happening to them.

McGettigan made a point to say he does not condemn Penn State University or even Sandusky’s foundation “The Second Mile” for what Sandusky did, but he does feel more people should have had their eyes open to their surroundings.

“I don’t know if (sexual abuse) can be eradicated,” McGettigan said. “But what we can do is minimize the abuse and the damages it causes.” He went on to say that his best advice to individuals who might help prevent abuse is, “You can be observant.”

Reach Matt Mattei at 570-991-6651 or mmattei@timesleader.com.
Login to view embedded media

Your chance to meet Grantland writer Michael Weinreb

Author of this article: A Failed Experiment

"The Grand Experiment is a failure, and the entire laboratory is contaminated, and there is no choice but to go back and start all over again."

At least the $50 goes to a good cause (Schlow Library) but their selection of this nasty person as their featured speaker is a mystery. Did anyone at Schlow actually read his articles?

RAISE IT!!!!! Again.

That may have been the most "Un-Cardinal" loss of the entire year.

In typical Cardinal fashion.....tie game late:

Cards leadoff guy draws a walk on a 3-2 pitch:

Next batter - double play ball.....but the Brewers kick it:

Up to that point.....Same Old Cardinal Ballgame.....

But then........



Maybe FairGambit is a pessimist????

With two on and none out, Juicer Peralta strikes out on a 3-2 pitch, and the lead runner is cut down at third.

Then, in the ninth, Rosenthal gives up a lead off go-ahead HR to Davis.


Cardinals, once again get the lead off man on in the ninth.....but after sacrificing to second.....next two guys do their Baez/Soler impression (and strike out)

Unfortunately, rather than addressing the "insufficient gate personnel" issue....

like, maybe, working with some temp agency to bring in a couple dozen ticket takers, Tsunami Sandy was spending her week:

Glad-handing with BOT members.....and making sure the appropriate AAAD had instructions to pick up her Saturday pantsuit at the dry-cleaners (so that she could pose on the field with big $$$ donors)
  • Like
Reactions: eloracv

UPDATE: Masshole shamefully deletes fb post. Keith Masser shares story on facebook about Joe Paterno

Penn State Board of Trustees chairman Keith Masser shared a story on facebook about former Penn State coach Joe Paterno.

Shared on June 22. Login to view embedded media
Joe Paterno had two legacies, and his followers need to accept it
http://www.dailylocal.com/article/20150622/SPORTS/150629966
By Lee Hudnell, lhudnell@dailylocal.com, @LeeHudnell on Twitter | 06/22/15

It was announced this past week that legendary Penn State football coach Joe Paterno will be inducted into the Pennsylvania Sports Hall of Fame in October.

The honor is certainly well-deserved.

The late Nittany Lions mentor is a football icon, who belongs on the Mount Rushmore of college football coaches alongside Bear Bryant, Woody Hayes and Eddie Robinson. Actually, he may be the greatest of them all when you factor in his longevity of success and his impact on a single university and state.

In 46 seasons at Penn State, Paterno won 75 percent of the games he coached, including two national championships. He won more games than any coach in Div. I history (409), and it wasn’t because he simply accumulated more years than the other greats. In nearly half a century roaming the sideline in Happy Valley, Paterno posted just five losing campaigns. His teams won at least 10 games in a season 21 times, including 14 with 11 wins or more — both all-time records.

Also, no coach or player has ever been more recognizable with a program or university than Paterno. He wasn’t just a coach for Penn State football, he was Penn State football. Hell, he was a football institution in the state of Pennsylvania, not just State College. Growing up as a kid in Ohio, if you would’ve asked me to name five things about football in the Commonwealth I would’ve replied, “Paterno, Paterno, Paterno, Randall Cunningham and Paterno.”

There is no denying the incredible gridiron legacy of the man they called “Joe Pa,” and his followers have certainly been celebrating it over the past few days — as they should.

However, where his followers and I go separate ways is when the discussion of his other legacy takes place — his role in the child sex abuse scandal involving former assistant Jerry Sandusky.

I recall watching hordes of Penn State students rallying around Paterno that night in November 2011 after the board of trustees dismissed him as head coach. I remember wondering how Sandusky’s rape victims and their families must have been feeling at that very moment.

I certainly cannot speak for any of the victims, but the emotions going through my mind and body were ones of anger and disgust.

Every time I heard a chant of “JOE PA-TER-NO!” it made me sick to my stomach. Every time the students belted cheers of “WE ARE (clap, clap) PENN STATE,” I became enraged.

The protests by the students — which most on hand probably thought were noble and supportive — displayed just how little perspective they possessed when it came to reality. I’m betting most of those protesting students didn’t have children of their own or were ever sexually abused growing up.

There shouldn’t have been one tear shed or one chant cheered for Paterno that night. His ousting was completely justified. It wasn’t a rash decision. It was the only decision.

I also recall a reporter during the press conference that same night — to announce the coach’s firing — who asked the vice president of the board, John Surma Jr., to explain why the trustees couldn’t allow Paterno to leave with some dignity?

Wow, really?

Where is the “dignity” for those young boys who were raped, molested and sodomized by Paterno’s assistant? Where was the rally for Sandusky’s prey? They were the real victims — not Paterno, not the university and certainly not the protesting students.

Nearly four years later, those sentiments are still ringing the same in State College. They just can’t accept the fact that their beloved figurehead dropped the ball on these disgusting acts.

They continue to blame the media for “unfairly attacking Paterno.” They continue pointing fingers at everyone involved from former Penn State President Graham Spanier to former AD Tim Curley to former assistant Mike McQueary and everyone in between — except, of course, Paterno.

It’s as if turning your back to protect a legacy is protocol at the Commonwealth’s most notable collegiate football institution.

Just this past week in an interview with the Huffington Post, Paterno’s son, Jay Paterno, exemplified that very culture of deniability.

“I think what happened — thoughtful people who have paid attention — are looking and saying ‘Wait a minute. There was a rush to judgement. There was an inaccurate rush to judgement,’” Jay Paterno said. “Joe Paterno was a guy who reported an allegation that was brought to him and that was the extent of his involvement. He followed the law. He did more than the law even required.”

That’s the problem, simply reporting the allegation was, in fact, the extent of his involvement. And to say he did “more than the law even required” is certainly debatable and borderline laughable.

What isn’t up for debate, though, is the fact that Paterno had the power, the responsibility, and an obligation to put an end to this madness, and he ignored it. For years.

He wanted nothing to do with it because there wasn’t any way he could spin it that would prevent his legacy from at least being dinged. And as we all know, Paterno’s legacy was everything to him and not even young boys getting raped was going to make him put that in danger.

We can make excuses all we want. We can say that the report by Louis Freeh was rushed and based solely on circumstantial evidence. But Paterno knew of Sandusky’s heinous acts for at least a decade and did nothing of significance to stop it.

Sure, Paterno reported — or more like confided with a few of his colleagues — about what had happened, but how could he have not followed up on it? How can you report something as ghastly as sexual abuse of young boys and not see to it that the perpetrator suffers great consequences? Better yet, how do you allow a monster who you know has been accused of sexual activity with young boys on more than one occasion continue to have an office in your facility?

The only conceivable reason I can think of for this blatant inaction is that he was trying to protect something. In this case it wasn’t Sandusky he was protecting, it was himself — it was his precious legacy.

Again, I don’t believe Paterno’s coaching prowess should be in question. He was one of the greatest of all time, in any sport. We cannot deny his legendary status on the gridiron.

He is most definitely a hall of famer.

But we can’t deny that he made a terrible mistake not putting an end to Sandusky’s terror when he had the chance.

I believe that Paterno was a good man, who made a terribly selfish decision.

Unfortunately it’s a part of his legacy now. Not all of it, but definitely a part of it.

And his followers need to finally accept that fact and quit turning their back on this issue like Paterno did for so many years.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT