Mike Scott is missing, so need to factor in his 2 yr near 10mil deal
What do you think of Josh Richardson? Seems to have gotten significantly better each year and is only 25. Averaged almost 17 lPts ast year.
Late bloomer; he not only increased his scoring last year but also his rebounds and assists. Really like the 86% FT shooting.What do you think of Josh Richardson? Seems to have gotten significantly better each year and is only 25. Averaged almost 17 lPts ast year.
What do you think of Josh Richardson? Seems to have gotten significantly better each year and is only 25. Averaged almost 17 lPts ast year.
Thanks for your analysis Tom.He plays SG and SF. He's a good defender, which is important, as Butler was their best defender on the perimeter. As you mention, he's young (which was a concern with Jimmy, especially if he insisted on the 5-year max). Plus, he's got a good shot, which has gotten better during his NBA career.
I wonder if it's a straight-up sign and trade, with Jimmy going to the Heat, and Richardson coming to the Sixers. The terms of the trade haven't been released by either team, or the league. If that's all there is to it, I'm surprised the Sixers didn't get more for Butler. They seemed to have more leverage than did the Heat or Butler.
If there's no other players as part of the trade, then the Sixers need to get another shooter. They lost Redick and Butler, and replaced that with Richardson. I'd love to be surprised, but I don't expect Richardson to totally replace the outside O of Redick and Butler, and I question how much of a jumper Simmons can develop this offseason.
It is interesting to note that Butler did not sign a 5-year deal with the Sixers, and then get traded to the Heat. He signed a 4-year deal. That's a surprise to me, as he's leaving a lot of $$ on the table, and I don't see the Heat contending with the top teams in the East.
He plays SG and SF. He's a good defender, which is important, as Butler was their best defender on the perimeter. As you mention, he's young (which was a concern with Jimmy, especially if he insisted on the 5-year max). Plus, he's got a good shot, which has gotten better during his NBA career.
I wonder if it's a straight-up sign and trade, with Jimmy going to the Heat, and Richardson coming to the Sixers. The terms of the trade haven't been released by either team, or the league. If that's all there is to it, I'm surprised the Sixers didn't get more for Butler. They seemed to have more leverage than did the Heat or Butler.
If there's no other players as part of the trade, then the Sixers need to get another shooter. They lost Redick and Butler, and replaced that with Richardson. I'd love to be surprised, but I don't expect Richardson to totally replace the outside O of Redick and Butler, and I question how much of a jumper Simmons can develop this offseason.
It is interesting to note that Butler did not sign a 5-year deal with the Sixers, and then get traded to the Heat. He signed a 4-year deal. That's a surprise to me, as he's leaving a lot of $$ on the table, and I don't see the Heat contending with the top teams in the East.
Under the new CBA Butler can not sign the 5 year max with Sixers and then be traded. Only the 4 year max. Still a surprise he left the extra money on the table.
Why would the Sixer's make the trade for Butler then not want to give him the Max, but then give Harris the Max. I thought they were Star hunting then they let him walk.
Why would the Sixer's make the trade for Butler then not want to give him the Max, but then give Harris the Max. I thought they were Star hunting then they let him walk.
Sounds like the Butler trade hit a snag, at least for now. Heat need to shed more salary and an initial deal with the Mavs fell through.
Yes, the Sixers didn't want to take any more salary back so they could do the Horford deal. But Miami can't do the deal until they shed salary. So a third team is needed to finalize the deal (and take salary from Miami). Mavs were originally the team, but supposedly have backed out.The way I understood it, Philly only wanted Richardson. And three other players need traded elsewhere.
Yes, the Sixers didn't want to take any more salary back so they could do the Horford deal. But Miami can't do the deal until they shed salary. So a third team is needed to finalize the deal (and take salary from Miami). Mavs were originally the team, but supposedly have backed out.
All I heard form the talking heads the last two weeks is if the Sixer offered Jimmy the 5 year 180 million max he would stay, then yesterday some reporters(Woj) say they only offered 3 year max deal to Jimmy. I was just wondering why you give Tobias the max 5 year deal and not Jimmy if your are star hunting. Reading now that Jimmy was not good in the locker room that is why 76ers were only offering 3 year max, Makes sense now.I'm not sure I follow. The Sixers could have offered him the max. We don't know if they did or did not. However, even if they offered him the max, Butler was under no obligation to sign it. That was the leverage Jimmy had over the Sixers. He could have signed with anybody, provided they had the cap space. The Heat didn't have the space, so they needed to do a trade-and-sign deal with the Sixers to enable them to land Jimmy. If Jimmy wanted to go to another team, a trade-and-sign is better for the Sixers than Jimmy just signing with a team that had cap space, as they'd go no competition in that scenario.
I was just wondering why you give Tobias the max 5 year deal and not Jimmy if your are star hunting.
All I heard form the talking heads the last two weeks is if the Sixer offered Jimmy the 5 year 180 million max he would stay, then yesterday some reporters(Woj) say they only offered 3 year max deal to Jimmy. I was just wondering why you give Tobias the max 5 year deal and not Jimmy if your are star hunting.