Alright let's give you a little lesson with raw facts and video evidence. You want to keep talking about delusion. You're showing extreme cases of it.
Let's start with Sorensen since you want to be corrected on that match apparently.
Here's what you said about Sorensen:
"Snorenson was not in control of the match and was losing until the 3rd. I understand you are completely delusional but stop quoting my posts trying to convince me of what I saw. I have more than enough wrestling experience to draw my own conclusions. Sorenson will not be the favorite to make the finals come March, similar to last year when he was the 4 seed after being the 2 all year. Myles dominated the entire match and the score was not messed up, you are dumb. Martin dominated and got unlucky in a late scramble to miss the tech."
Sorensen losing until the 3rd period? No.
First period 0-0 not a lot of action. Sorensen took 4 shots to Hayes 1 shot. Sorensen was generally the aggressor and controlled the majority of the ties. Overall a pretty inactive period by both guys.
Second period. Sorensen chooses down. He's up and out within 10 seconds and takes the lead 1-0. Sorensen takes the first shot of the period as Hayes is backing up. Stall warning on Hayes. Hayes shoots a double as he's backing up and Sorensen is chasing. Sorensen counters. Hayes sticks with it and gets ahold of far ankle. Finishes really well for the first TD of the match. 2-1 Hayes. Sorensen escapes within 5 seconds of being taken down. Match tied up 2-2. Minuscule riding time advantage for Hayes. Neither guy shoots the rest of the period.
Third period. Hayes chooses neutral. Sorensen with a half shot followed by another shot. Sorensen the aggressor. Sorensen with another shot. Nothing from Hayes 35 seconds into period 3. Hayes shoots a long double that is stuffed and immediately puts his head onto the mat. Sorensen tries to circle for two, and drives Hayes out of bounds. 1:06 remaining still tied 2-2. 16 seconds riding time for Hayes. Sorensen shoots a deep single just after the whistle. Gets in deep and elevates. Puts Hayes in danger, and then finishes the shot for 2. 4-2 lead for Sorensen. Sorensen rides out remaining 46 seconds and Hayes does not come close at all to escaping. 4-2 win for Sorensen with 30 seconds of riding time.
Sorensen took more shots, was the aggressor, controlled the tie ups. Had more riding time. Got the only escape of the match. Each guy with one takedown. Hayes had a great shot and finish but that was it the entire match. Hayes had the lead for a whopping 10 seconds in the match. Remainder was tied or Sorensen with the lead.
By no means did Hayes control that match. You claim Sorensen won't be the favorite to make the finals come March? How is that so? It is a clear cut Zain #1 and Sorensen #2 and that isn't changing unless Sorensen loses. Like it or not, Sorensen is the heavy favorite to make the finals. Does that mean he is guaranteed to do so? Absolutely not but he is undoubtedly the favorite right now.
Ok now let's pull up the video of Martin Bowman. Here's the link for you. Doesn't work in chrome. Works for me in IE:
https://www.btn2go.com/embed?id=29494
Third period. Martin with a 15-5 lead and riding time at 1:06 for Martin but counting down since Bowman is riding on top. Martin starts to come up. Bowman drops down to a leg and is in a single leg take down finish with the leg elevated above his head. He's still in control on top at this time. He's grabbing a hold of Martin's ankle. He has full control with Martin not close to going around. Bowman then goes to 2 hands on the one ankle. Martin's shoe pops off and he spins behind for what looks like a reversal, but clearly only got out because of his shoe coming off. Ref calls delay of match. Brands checks with official to confirm if it was injury time since the shoe came off. Official confirms that it was injury time. The ref did not award a reversal. In fact he was going to resume the match with Bowman on top since it was not a reversal. Since it was injury time, Bowman gets his choice in position and chooses down. You can hear the official as clear as day saying "no reversal" in the broadcast. However, the people working the scoring table awarded 2 to Martin erroneously. The scoreboard is showing 17-5. You can even hear someone in the background shout "Score's wrong". Next Brands asks "did you award a reversal??" The official says, "no, no it was just injury time". You can even hear the official say the score should be at 15. However, he never corrected the scoreboard and the score remained incorrect for the remainder of the match and resulted in a major instead of a decision. So the match then resumes with Bowman getting his choice following the Martin injury time. Bowman chooses down. Bowman then gets an escape immediately. Now score should be 6-15. Bowman locks up a cradle on a go behind with 19 seconds remaining. Gets the TD so now score should be 15-8. Match concludes. No riding time pt for either guy. Final score on scoreboard is incorrectly showing 17-8. Match is truly 15-8 which is a 7 pt decision not a 9 pt major.
These are all facts. Goodluck arguing against all of that video evidence. Am I still the delusional one or is ironically you? You claim you have more than enough wrestling experience to know what you saw. Well your eyes are lying to you then. You can't deny reality and facts.
And one last final point. You claimed Martin got "unlucky" in a late scramble to miss the tech. So now you're using luck as a valid reason why Martin didn't get the tech? You gotta be kidding me Dr. delusion lmfao. Couldn't it be unlucky for Bowman that he didn't get the fall? He had the cradle locked up and was turning Martin over. Just ridiculous to call that unlucky for Martin lol. The fact is Bowman was closer to winning the match than Martin was to the tech.
Can't wait to hear your rebuttal to the facts. I expect an apology.
