ADVERTISEMENT

OSU WISC game thread...

So again, I guess tO$U definitely doesn't qualify as a "really good defense" given that a really crappy Wisconsin offense (one of the worst in the conference) just torched them both in terms of Total Yards and Rushing Yards.....

And only scored 23 points in an overtime game and lost. So I would say Wisconsin's offense is better than you give them credit for and OSU's defense is better than you give them credit for. It was a close game with two top 10 teams...I'm not sure what you expected but if you think the #2 team in the nation should blow out the #8 team in the nation or the #8 team should not be able to gain any yards against any team, then I'm not sure what you're expectations for college football are.
 
i'm still tryin g to understand why herbie thought the call could not be overturned (that there could not possibly be enough evidence).

i hafta guess they don't have the feed that showed the laces touching green. lotsa green. must be the penn state feed.

guy is a tool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bjf1991
i'm still tryin g to understand why herbie thought the call could not be overturned (that there could not possibly be enough evidence).

i hafta guess they don't have the feed that showed the laces touching green. lotsa green. must be the penn state feed.

guy is a tool.

Laces? At least 2/3 of the ball contacted the ground and the receiver lost control of the ball after the ball hit the ground! There is absolutely no question about it when ball contacts ground and receiver immediately losses control of the ball that it is not a "catch" as per the rulebook. Herbie just had his ultra-thick "sillver-bullet" goggles on....that's why he "couldn't see it", LMFAO!
 
  • Like
Reactions: N&B4PSU
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT