If the call was defensible, they would have just said the call was correct. They always side with the officials whenever possible. It's only when it's egregiously incorrect that they don't affirm the call, explicitly. Here, they not only didn't affirm the call, but they changed their procedure going forward, so the call doesn't happen again. They're not going to change how their officials line up, and OK that with the NCAA, just to "shut people up" on a correct call.False. The complaint is what started this not the call.
So, the separate statement defends the call--of course it does--as I said all along it would which is why you've yet to share it
The call was correct--there's nothing wrong with it which is why the Big Ten didn't say it was wrong and since it can't be reviewed they added an additional official to the LOS to shut people up. Same reason they won't comment on it further. It's a non-story to them.
That's not how any of this works.