I'm not though but if you want to believe that you're entitled to
The Big Ten statement proves me right (if the other part exists)
Refs Strike Again at Michigan
- Thread starter ryoder1
- Start date
The Big Ten statement proves me right (if the other part exists)
Such a f'ing moron (and a$$hole), it isn't even funny. His latest bafoonery is claiming no provable connection between the B1G's Statement yesterday and the Onside Kick in Minny-scUM game DESPITE THE FACT that PJ Fleck is on record MONDAY (the day before yesterday) that there absolutely is a direct connection to the Onside Kick in Minny-scUM game with 1:40 remaining -- namely that he, PJ Fleck, precipitated the all of the B1G responses on Tuesday by the fact he submitted the video of the play in question to the league front-office demanding a formal response (Fleck didn't say when exactly he submitted the play, but physics says his submission would have had to occur sometime between Saturday night after the game and his public statement Monday). In any event, there absolutely is undeniable, irrefutable proof of a connection between the play in the Minny-scUM game and the B1G's actions a day after Fleck confirmed he formally submitted video of play for evaluation and explanation - including the fact the B1G responded to, and communicated with, PJ Fleck regarding the play he said he submitted to the league front-office (a request which provably precipitated all of the B1G's subsequent actions on Tuesday) BEFORE they made their formal public statement on the topic.
This is beyond clear to anyone living in reality which does not include our visiting douche troll.
Last edited:
No, the statement the b1g communications vp put out connecting the bad call and changing the protocol does not prove you right about anything.
You have delusions of grandeur. It is not pretty.
Just gave you another big hint.
Keep groveling, you will get there.
You're saying that Big Ten referenced the play in question and said the right process was followed, correct?
How am I groveling?
Listen--when you guys get something new let me know but...
LOL... The Big Ten communicated with the impacted coach and changed the rule. You are the only douchebag who can't interpret what that means. It's pathetic and humorous at the same time. Congratulations.
Huh? The ball is on the 35.5 yard line and the player is before the 35 yard line
The only obvious thing here is that HandJoCommando is in need of serious clinical attention.
Please tell me you're not looking at his feet and thinking that's all that matters
Do you believe OL can stand at the LOS with the rest of their body across it?
The feet don't matter.
So now you're saying you acknowledge they didn't admit it but you're interpreting it that way which is what I've said for 4 pages--shocking--right again
You didn't cite any facts. Only we have. And you refuse to believe facts.
Lando in the land of make believe........................ lol...............
Facts are "this is how I interrupt what was said" or "someone told me"
Facts are what actually exists
Wrong again. They changed the protocol regarding on side kicks to attempt to prevent future wrong calls such as this.You're saying that Big Ten referenced the play in question and said the right process was followed, correct?
How am I groveling?
Listen--when you guys get something new let me know but...
Wrong. Read the quote.
Again for your little mind to comprehend....
From CBS News; October 2. 2024
"The Big Ten later admitted that there was an officiating mistake on the play, saying it was "too tight" to throw a flag in that situation."
Are you questioning that this quote does not exist? Why would the B10 not object to this statement if they believe the call was 100% correct?
Furthermore, I believe you are arguing that the call was 100% correct. If that is indeed the case then the Mike Peria "I think" it is not offsides statement means it is not a certainty he was offsides. If you believe something is 100% correct you would never say I think it is incorrect. Impossible and obviously illogical. You don't know what you are talking about. Facts get in the way of your narrative.
Fact: in the last minute and half of a one score game minn attempted and recovered an on side kick.
Fact: an off side penalty was called negating the sucessfull on side kick ensuring a mich win. The penalty is not reviewable.
Fact: the play is replayed multiple times on tv.
Fact: rules experts review and say the call should not have been called.
Fact: minn asks b1g conf suits for an explanation.
Fact: immediaty b1g requests ncaa permission to change how officials postion themselves for on side kicks.
Fact: ncaa immediately grants permission.
Fact: as a result of this penalty in this game preventing minn from a chance to win and ensuring a mich win, b1g immediately issues an immediate change to on side kick protocol to potentially prevent a similar controversial call.
Fact: to little too late for minn but another tainted win by mich. And that is what counts.
Fact: an off side penalty was called negating the sucessfull on side kick ensuring a mich win. The penalty is not reviewable.
Fact: the play is replayed multiple times on tv.
Fact: rules experts review and say the call should not have been called.
Fact: minn asks b1g conf suits for an explanation.
Fact: immediaty b1g requests ncaa permission to change how officials postion themselves for on side kicks.
Fact: ncaa immediately grants permission.
Fact: as a result of this penalty in this game preventing minn from a chance to win and ensuring a mich win, b1g immediately issues an immediate change to on side kick protocol to potentially prevent a similar controversial call.
Fact: to little too late for minn but another tainted win by mich. And that is what counts.
No part of his body is across the line. And the ball has already been contacted and is a yard and a half away from the kicker. No offside. You lose. Again.
What, no posts in this thread since the 11:00 PM hour last night?? Unsatisfactory, gentlemen. Need more effort than that if this thing is gonna get to the goal of 20 pages.
Plus as it stands, Lando has the last word, which is unacceptable. Then again, he'll have the last word regardless. There could be a nuclear attack tomorrow, and he would crawl through the bodies and ruins with his laptop to find a working Internet connection for one last post...
Plus as it stands, Lando has the last word, which is unacceptable. Then again, he'll have the last word regardless. There could be a nuclear attack tomorrow, and he would crawl through the bodies and ruins with his laptop to find a working Internet connection for one last post...
What exists is a bad call and the big ten admitting it, and taking action on it. That exists, but somehow you can't cope with that... lol...
Go ahead and tell us the Big Ten did not take action on the bad call. That will be funny, but we trust you to do it.
Once a troll boy named Lando was watching his 20th straight hour of TV for the day. During his favorite nighttime show, he started to notice that the pretty actress on the screen was talking and looking directly at him. Eventually, he drifted off to sleep. When he awoke, he was so excited, that he rush to tell his caretakers about this Shockingly, none of them believed him. He quickly became convinced that they were all just jealous of the connection between the two, and these "caretakers" were trying to come in between the predestined couple.
He had nothing else to keep him occupied, other than his incessant TV-viewing, so he dedicated himself toward gathering all relevant information on her ... he eventually found out where she lived, and then started following her everywhere, convinced random movements and looks were clandestine indications of interest and invitations to keep following her.
One night he couldn't take it anymore ... he had to be nearer ... their love was pulling him closer. He ended up climbing through a window into her house, creeping into her bedroom, taking off his clothes and hovering over her while she slept, thinking to himself how lucky he was to have been invited into their future love palace. The actress woke up and, seeing a troll-like figure staring at her from inches away, breathing heavily, with drool dripping off his chin ... she screamed, jumped up and ran out of the room to call the police.
Lando was convinced that the screams were screams of passion, and that she ran away only because she was so enamored with him, seeing him disrobed, that she couldn't stand it, and had to create space between the two, lest she give into her passions, which would overwhelm her. Obviously she didn't call the police ... they just happened to show up on their own ... probably a cop was passing by when he heard the scream. When the police mentioned she dialed 911, Lando the troll boy determined that, since the policeman never mentioned that she called the police ... just 911 ... she was obviously calling 911 just to report a medical emergency ... she thought she was going to pass out from the excitement and joy of finding Lando the troll boy in her room. He had finally got the message, and couldn't be convinced otherwise.
The court granted Lando bail, and, in the meantime, the actress, obviously shaken up, changed her number and moved to a new temporary location. She even adopted a new look - cut and colored her hair, started wearing different styles of clothing, and would only go outside with a hat and sunglasses on, so as to avoid the possibility Lando the troll boy could spot her. Lando, of course, would not be deterred. He eventually found her, convinced she wanted him to, because she never specifically uttered the words "stay away" and, obviously, someone who wanted you to stay away, would say "stay away," just as the many people he had encountered in the past had done.
And now the actress is dead. The end.
----------------------------
This story is equivalent to Lando's actions and arguments here.
What a dumb and creepy dude this guy is. He's not right in the noggin.
You never admitted it. The Big Ten recognized the blown call and did something about it. It's a fact you are having a hard time digesting. It's OK. Most of us find it hilarious.
Again, the Big Ten has never said the call was wrong. That's not an opinion. That's a fact
The Big Ten took action so bad calls would never happen again. That's the fact. We are sorry you cannot interpret that action correctly, but that's your problem.
And the Big Ten did admit it was the wrong call to PJ Fleck. It's been reported and since the Big Ten hasn't refuted it, it's true. It's a fact. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's untrue.
Again, this is what you do--you alter statement to fit what you need them to say
No wonder you failed at being an attorney. Did you ever win a case or never got that far?
"She never said 'stay away'. That's not an opinion. That's a fact."
Psst ... the Big Ten has admitted the call was wrong.
That's an opinion not a fact.
You even admit it's an interpretation not a statement
Fleck saying that doesn't mean that's what was said as you went to "they haven't refuted" it meaning it's an admission it's true which is wrong
You're truly an idiot but most of you are so I'm used to that here. You literally proved yourself wrong in both paragraphs
No one with any actual experience and training within the law would assume a lawyer was trying cases. That's something an ignorant layman would do. You know, someone like you.
They didn't.
Quote it--you can't and we know that. That's your interpretation of it.
When you all get something new let me know.
Like Jimmy Buffett said, we're all grateful for the laughs without them we'd all go insane like Hand-on-Commando......
The argument is already over, sport. You lost. Everyone agrees, except you.
Your desperate last gasp was to try to deny reality by demanding an irrelevancy, and everyone laughed you off. But that's what you're still hanging your hat on after all this time.
"She never said 'stay away.' How could she want me to stay away if she never said those words!? She wanted me!"
Remember the two seconds added back onto the clock for UM. My wife was ranting about it while I told her it won't matter.........
He keeps morphing his arguments (more accurately, his inanities) every time he is presented with factual realities related to this situation.... a review of his latest is positively comical:
- PJ Fleck is a liar????
- there is no connection between the Offsides call in Minny-scUM game that wiped out an Onside Kick Recovery by Minny and the B1G's Tuesday Statement??? (Despite the fact that PJ Fleck publicly stated ON MONDAY that he had submitted the play to B1G for Review, spoke to B1G Commish and was awaiting an imminent response. Also despite the fact that the B1G Commissioner and Coordinator of Officiating have acknowledged that PJ Fleck / Minnesota submitted the play for Review.)?????
Effectively, Hand-on-Commando has been reduced to behavior similar to a toddler saying, "Mr. Nobody did it." when asked by their parent(s) who did something...
Similar threads
