Proof?Michigan had zero fear of Clifford throwing the ball. Zero.
Proof?Michigan had zero fear of Clifford throwing the ball. Zero.
Their defense was in the box all day. They know his completion rate on long passes. They know his overall completion rate.Proof?
I guess you could say we “only” had two 3-and-outs in the first half, but we had three total possessions in the first half. Going 3-and-out on 67% of them is pretty brutal, especially for a defense that couldn’t get off the field all dayWe only had two 3-and-outs in the first half, and none the rest of the game. Michigan had the ball for 50 plays because our defense couldn't get them off the field. The pick 6 hurt our defense in the long run because it forced them to play 16 plays in a row and based on the second half tackling, they didn't recover.
Essentially, unless we fielded an offense like Tennessee or OSU, we weren't winning vs Michigan this past weekend. You have to stop somebody eventually. At least once.
Thank youMichigan had zero fear of Clifford throwing the ball. Zero.
This is a concern (Vellieux) potentially portaling out. That leaves PSU with 3 QBs with very little experience unless Allar gets lots of PT in the final 5 games. I can't believe Vellieux wasn't put into the game when Clifford went down, more mobile that Allar and throws a good catchable ball. It's possible that some promises were made to Allar during his recruitment about the depth chart for 2022. It would not bode well if Vellieux portals.I believe that Veilleux will be in a real QB competition at another school this coming Spring. Yep he has full game experience which is why after seeing Allar jump him and basically being annointed the next starting PSU QB there is little reason for Veilleux to stay at PSU. It would be a pleasant surprise to me if Veilleux stays at PSU for another season.
Would be nice to see the 2023 QB Smolik enroll early so at least PSU has 3 scholarship QB's for the Spring.
I can't believe Veilleux was not the backup in the first game. In Veilleux's game action last season what I saw was a QB more mobile than Clifford and more accurate than Clifford. I'm surely not rooting against Allar, but it does not matter why Allar became the #2 QB as any rational person giving Veilleux advice would recommend him going somewhere else in January and competing to start at that school this coming Spring. I believe Veilleux has shown more than any QB that has transferred out of PSU and that includes Levis. And that Veilleux will go to another P5 school and have a great career there.This is a concern (Vellieux) potentially portaling out. That leaves PSU with 3 QBs with very little experience unless Allar gets lots of PT in the final 5 games. I can't believe Vellieux wasn't put into the game when Clifford went down, more mobile that Allar and throws a good catchable ball. It's possible that some promises were made to Allar during his recruitment about the depth chart for 2022. It would not bode well if Vellieux portals.
Nice throw, no question...what about the other 18? Problem is Clifford doesn't complete long throws, or any others for that matter, consistently enough to threaten opposing D's...that's why they can crowd the LOS to take away running lanes.Clifford threw a beautiful deep ball to Wallace (48 yards) that was caught.
"Well, 5 for 10 is somewhat better"
Not at 3.7 yards per attempt it isn't.
Clifford is the answer until PSU loses another game. Unless he is seriously hurt (obviously).
You say he doesn't complete any long throws but I just gave you an example of long throws. He clearly can throw the long ball. See:Nice throw, no question...what about the other 18? Problem is Clifford doesn't complete long throws, or any others for that matter, consistently enough to threaten opposing D's...that's why they can crowd the LOS to take away running lanes.
Except he ain't getting sacked 5 times. Even against Michigan, did you see how hard it is to sack this kid? He avoided at least 3 certain sacks that Cliff would have taken.If Allar is so mentally weak he cannot handle getting sacked say 4-5 times or more vs O$U then we have bigger problems with him. This is basically the minor leagues of the NFL. This kid fully expects to be in the NFL in 3 years. He is a big boy literally and figuratively. He can handle it. Put him in against Minny as the starter. We can beat them with him as the starter and he gains confidence while assuming the leadership role for this team. We have nothing to lose. Allar is the future. Clifford gives us no better shot against Minny or O$U and more downside in my opinion.
Did they fear Allar throwing the ball?Michigan had zero fear of Clifford throwing the ball. Zero.
The amount of people on here who still want Clifford at QB is insane. I really don't understand it. They think 6 years in Cliff is going ti be good all of a sudden?Except he ain't getting sacked 5 times. Even against Michigan, did you see how hard it is to sack this kid? He avoided at least 3 certain sacks that Cliff would have taken.
That's not proof. Go **** yourself, you ignorant POS.7 for 19. There ya go. Proof. Now shut up.
Allar got sacked multiple times. Clifford was perhaps sacked once. Check your facts.Except he ain't getting sacked 5 times. Even against Michigan, did you see how hard it is to sack this kid? He avoided at least 3 certain sacks that Cliff would have taken.
Wrong. Why do you lie when you can just check the box score.Allar got sacked multiple times. Clifford was perhaps sacked once. Check your facts.
Because I was at the game and saw it. Also the box score doesn't show who was sacked, only that Michigan had two sacks on the day. I'm pretty sure each was sacked once.Wrong. Why do you lie when you can just check the box score.
Correct. So Allar was not sacked multiple times...Because I was at the game and saw it. Also the box score doesn't show who was sacked, only that Michigan had two sacks on the day. I'm pretty sure each was sacked once.
So he was sacked the same number of times as Clifford. While playing much less. So more sacks/snap. So how does that back up your point? SMFH.Correct. So Allar was not sacked multiple times...
Just stating that you're not being factualSo he was sacked the same number of times as Clifford. While playing much less. So more sacks/snap. So how does that back up your point? SMFH.
"Allar was sacked twice, but the one didn't end up counting because of an offsides."Just stating that you're not being factual
Offsides doesnt count as a sack for a reason lol."Allar was sacked twice, but the one didn't end up counting because of an offsides."
So you can see how that was my impression from the stands without consulting the play by play (the box score doesn't show who was sacked).
So he was sacked the same number of times as Clifford. While playing much less. So more sacks/snap. So how does that back up your point? SMFH.
a) agreed, but you can see how that was my impression from watching the game from the stands.Offsides doesnt count as a sack for a reason lol.
Sometimes we agree, sometimes we don’t. This time just admit that you were wrong.a) agreed, but you can see how that was my impression from watching the game from the stands.
b) if he was that elusive/strong whatever (as you claim) he wouldn't have been sacked because a guy lined up 2 inches offsides.
I wasn't wrong. Allar was sack twice (one more than Clifford), but one was called back by penalty. So I SAW him get sacked two times. That's not being wrong.Sometimes we agree, sometimes we don’t. This time just admit that you were wrong.
I agree with you that I an not ready to say Allar needs to take over right now - but not because I believe Clifford is going to suddenly take us past OSU and finish regular season 11-1. I don’t want to see Allar hurt. I’d rather see Vielliux (sp?) if Clifford can’t go because of the threat to run and his starting experience.
Keeps your record intact.I wasn't wrong. Allar was sack twice (one more than Clifford), but one was called back by penalty. So I SAW him get sacked two times. That's not being wrong.
I've been wrong. But it's rare. And I definitely wasn't wrong about seeing Allar getting sacked two times (one nullified by penalty).Keeps your record intact.
NEVER been wrong here.
Even Veilleaux gives us a better chance to win than Clifford.Sometimes we agree, sometimes we don’t. This time just admit that you were wrong.
I agree with you that I an not ready to say Allar needs to take over right now - but not because I believe Clifford is going to suddenly take us past OSU and finish regular season 11-1. I don’t want to see Allar hurt. I’d rather see Vielliux (sp?) if Clifford can’t go because of the threat to run and his starting experience.
LOL. He (CV) is fine, but he certainly doesn't give us a better chance to win than Clifford.Even Veilleaux gives us a better chance to win than Clifford.
Clifford is a garbage QB. Not sure what else he has to do to prove it to you.LOL. He (CV) is fine, but he certainly doesn't give us a better chance to win than Clifford.
All of the statistics prove you wrong there, super chief.Clifford is a garbage QB. Not sure what else he has to do to prove it to you.
I just reviewed Cliff's stats and they aren't great. Middle of the pack passer. His split stats are worse, he's barely a 50% passer in the 2nd half of games. I also degrade his stats a little bit because this is his 4th year starting, 4th, he should be extra efficient by now.All of the statistics prove you wrong there, super chief.
Please point out where you have admitted you were wrong and did not try to rationalize it into actually being right.I've been wrong. But it's rare. And I definitely wasn't wrong about seeing Allar getting sacked two times (one nullified by penalty).
Umm all of the stats show he is terrible....All of the statistics prove you wrong there, super chief.