No sure where you are getting ten points from. The officiating was bad through out but the fact of the matter is the officials got us to overtime and we blew it.Refs were horrible. Bad calls both ways, but they cost PSU at least 10 points.
First of all, go watch your team (the Pitt Panthers) get worked by Clemson.No sure where you are getting ten points from. The officiating was bad through out but the fact of the matter is the officials got us to overtime and we blew it.
How the Eff did the official get "us" (you are not us) to overtime? You are delusional.No sure where you are getting ten points from. The officiating was bad through out but the fact of the matter is the officials got us to overtime and we blew it.
LoLFirst of all, go watch your team (the Pitt Panthers) get worked by Clemson.
Second of all, my math is as follows:
They incorrectly took a defensive score off the board (fumble recovered in endzone) = 7
They missed the late hit/roughing the passer against Illinois which would have given PSU a first down deep in Illinois territory. At least a FG there, maybe a TD.
So 10-14 points were taken away by the refs. But if even 3 points were taken away by the refs, it costs PSU the game. Refs were atrocious.
The refs got the so-called fumble recovery correct. This is not debatable. The video (real-time is absolutely conclusive). Yes they missed the hit on Clifford which cost us a FG attempt. Given the offense's performance they likely don't make it to the end zone but I'll give you 3. The refs absolutely shafted Illinois out of the winning TD in the fourth. The ball was caught behind the line of scrimmage which makes neither defensive penalty correct. They got us to OT. We couldn't close it out.First of all, go watch your team (the Pitt Panthers) get worked by Clemson.
Second of all, my math is as follows:
They incorrectly took a defensive score off the board (fumble recovered in endzone) = 7
They missed the late hit/roughing the passer against Illinois which would have given PSU a first down deep in Illinois territory. At least a FG there, maybe a TD.
So 10-14 points were taken away by the refs. But if even 3 points were taken away by the refs, it costs PSU the game. Refs were atrocious.
How about you shove it up your @ss?No sure where you are getting ten points from. The officiating was bad through out but the fact of the matter is the officials got us to overtime and we blew it.
JV Posters want to always blame the refs. The refs should have never been in a position to make a difference. JV coaching should be the title.
Please. Don't tell me you are blaming that loss on the refs?Refs were horrible. Bad calls both ways, but they cost PSU at least 10 points.
I agree with this.It is what it is but to be honest and not trying to be disrespectful to Illinois, 10-14 points should not have even mattered in this game. PSU should have been able to score enough points that 10-14 points potentially cost on bad officiating should not have mattered or factored into the outcome of this game. Just my opinion.
The holding and late hit fouls would not offset. A late hit is a dead ball foul. If the late hit was called, the result is a net gain of 5 yards (-10 holding +15 late hit) and a first down for PSU.PSU got called for holding on the play that Clifford got hit late that wasn't called. So would that be offsetting penalties?
The forward progress judgment call was shady at best. I'd expect to see that more from an NFL crew than a college one.
I thought the back moved as well on the Illinois score but there wasn't a good enough replay to take another look. They got the ineligible receiver/OPI right on the negated Illinois TD. The only noise about that was because of how long it took to make the call.
Refs weren't the issue today. They weren't great but if you want to lay this disaster at their feet, you may want to go watch something else...a nature documentary perhaps.
What if it’s not a dead ball foul? I think this one was a normal live-ball roughing the passer. I should know this but I know the double foul enforcement gets a little muddy when one of the fouls is a 15-yarder.The holding and late hit fouls would not offset. A late hit is a dead ball foul. If the late hit was called, the result is a net gain of 5 yards (-10 holding +15 late hit) and a first down for PSU.
The refs did not determine the outcome of the game. We did not play good enough to win. The coaching was awful.Refs were horrible. Bad calls both ways, but they cost PSU at least 10 points.
Youre right, guess it wasn't after the play. I thought the personal foul type penalties always got treated separately regardless.What if it’s not a dead ball foul? I think this one was a normal live-ball roughing the passer. I should know this but I know the double foul enforcement gets a little muddy when one of the fouls is a 15-yarder.
They would both have been live ball penalties and offset…replay the down.Youre right, guess it wasn't after the play. I thought the personal foul type penalties always got treated separately regardless.
Ok. As I said above, I thought the personal foul type penalties were always enforced separately from the others. I didn't know live ball vs dead ball personal fouls were treated different.They would both have been live ball penalties and offset…replay the down.
Note that there are some differences between NCAA and NFL (though not on this play)…in the NFL, a 5 yard penalty is ignored if the other team commits a 15 yarder.Ok. As I said above, I thought the personal foul type penalties were always enforced separately from the others. I didn't know live ball vs dead ball personal fouls were treated different.
Can someone (maybe a former official?) walk me through what happened on the fumble recovery for a TD that was called back?
I did not hear a whistle blow indicating the play was over. Multiple referees acted as if the play was still live, including signaling touchdown for PSU. Did a referee actively "spot the ball" (indicating forward progress had stopped) without blowing his whistle? And no one noticed?
Or did they somehow talk about it afterwards and make this decision?
Because if it is the former, I guess that is simple human error (not blowing your whistle), from an officiating mechanics perspective anyway (I still think it was the wrong call).
If it is the latter...how can they do that? If forward progress was stopped, you have to decide that on the field in real time, not after the play, correct?
I'm still flabbergasted as to what happened there.
That was after 45 seconds of trying to get guys off the pile to determine who had the ball. Very suspicious.I was casually re-watching this morning and there wasn't a whistle. They said the call on the field was 'forward progress' and it's second down. That was that. Not reviewable. Makes zero sense.
I had a really good view of it, as I was on the PSU side around the 5 yard line...the official along the line of scrimmage (think it was the LJ...it was whichever official was on the PSU side) came in with his hand raised signaling the forward progress stoppage immediately. But, play was continuing and none of the players or other officials recognized that he had blown the play dead. He wasn't leaving his location because he had the spot, and it took him a while to get anyone else's attention (he was blowing his whistle, but between the crown, fireworks, celebration, Referee announcing fumble/touchdown, no one realized what he was calling). I said right away to the guy next to me that this is coming back, but I don't think that many recognized what was happening (including the 6 other members of the crew).Can someone (maybe a former official?) walk me through what happened on the fumble recovery for a TD that was called back?
I did not hear a whistle blow indicating the play was over. Multiple referees acted as if the play was still live, including signaling touchdown for PSU. Did a referee actively "spot the ball" (indicating forward progress had stopped) without blowing his whistle? And no one noticed?
Or did they somehow talk about it afterwards and make this decision?
Because if it is the former, I guess that is simple human error (not blowing your whistle), from an officiating mechanics perspective anyway (I still think it was the wrong call).
If it is the latter...how can they do that? If forward progress was stopped, you have to decide that on the field in real time, not after the play, correct?
I'm still flabbergasted as to what happened there.
I had a really good view of it, as I was on the PSU side around the 5 yard line...the official along the line of scrimmage (think it was the LJ...it was whichever official was on the PSU side) came in with his hand raised signaling the forward progress stoppage immediately. But, play was continuing and none of the players or other officials recognized that he had blown the play dead. He wasn't leaving his location because he had the spot, and it took him a while to get anyone else's attention (he was blowing his whistle, but between the crown, fireworks, celebration, Referee announcing fumble/touchdown, no one realized what he was calling). I said right away to the guy next to me that this is coming back, but I don't think that many recognized what was happening (including the 6 other members of the crew).
And, with that call, it isn't reviewable.
Not sure what TV picked up on the play (and I deleted that debacle the minute I got home), but my dad told me that they never did show the LJ killing the play on any of the TV replays.
And very slow with the whistles the rest of the game. To the point where I was afraid guys were going to get hurt on both teams.Still, I've never seen 'forward progress' called after about a half second of non-movement (and when the player hasn't yielded progress so to speak). Very quick with the call.
Definitely a quick call…but something I’ve been seeing a lot this season.Still, I've never seen 'forward progress' called after about a half second of non-movement (and when the player hasn't yielded progress so to speak). Very quick with the call.
Unfortunately, I did just go back and rewatch the play...it looks like the Back Judge also did realize that the Line Judge had killed the play, as he comes in late blowing his whistle and was the one that finally got the Referee's attention to tell him what was happening.I had a really good view of it, as I was on the PSU side around the 5 yard line...the official along the line of scrimmage (think it was the LJ...it was whichever official was on the PSU side) came in with his hand raised signaling the forward progress stoppage immediately. But, play was continuing and none of the players or other officials recognized that he had blown the play dead. He wasn't leaving his location because he had the spot, and it took him a while to get anyone else's attention (he was blowing his whistle, but between the crown, fireworks, celebration, Referee announcing fumble/touchdown, no one realized what he was calling). I said right away to the guy next to me that this is coming back, but I don't think that many recognized what was happening (including the 6 other members of the crew).
And, with that call, it isn't reviewable.
Not sure what TV picked up on the play (and I deleted that debacle the minute I got home), but my dad told me that they never did show the LJ killing the play on any of the TV replays.
Illinois had a 20 yard touchdown called back on a holding call.The amount of holding by Illinois was astounding. I don’t think they got flagged once.
Not unfortunately, it was on purpose.Unfortunately, I did just go back and rewatch the play...it looks like the Back Judge also did realize that the Line Judge had killed the play, as he comes in late blowing his whistle and was the one that finally got the Referee's attention to tell him what was happening.
Also, there were some earlier comments about the spot on the play being well off if they were killing the forward progress...the spot looked correct to me. Again, it was a very quick whistle (but once he blows it, the play is over and there isn't an option to ignore it unfortunately).
Ah right...all part of the grand conspiracy to advance Illinois football of course!Not unfortunately, it was on purpose.