I give it to the SEC--they know what they want and they are retelentless and shameless in going after it. Even in the face of 8 conference games (vs 9 in B10), several of them not playing any opponents from the other major conferences, and bad losses by their top teams (Tenn vs Arkansas, Bama vs Vandy, and Ole Miss vs Kentucky and LSU), they want at least 5 if not 6 spots in the CFP.
Over the past few weeks but especially increased this past week, SEC folks and their media supporters have been playing up their conference while simultaneously dumping on the B10 but specifically PSU and Indiana. I get the criticism on Indiana which is in part on their lack of any historical success and their strength of schedule but outside of Michigan, they have beaten everyone by 14+ points and rank 5th in game control and 2nd in Average In-Game Win Probability (a data point that ESPN uses). Our schedule is 35th in the country, higher than Oregon, Texas, Indiana, BYU, Miami, and Notre Dame. We have one close loss to the #2 team. But I've heard Pat Forde, Finebaum, etc all crap on us and push other contenders. Has anyone been advocating for us? I mean that as an honest question.
I realize the obvious answer to that is the B10 should be but many of us feel the B10 will protect 2 programs at a greater intensity than the other members. And maybe they are advocating behind closed doors but the barrage of talking heads hyping up SEC's placement in the CFP will push those opinions into a perceived reality for many (perhaps, including those in CFP selection committee).