Apparently what the judges said was they considered the whole last 50 seconds one sequence and that’s why they were able to go back that far. Seems like a stretch but I guess that was the thinking, we’ll see.
I assume that since there were no points awarded after the whistle and it was after 5 seconds? I think that's the point of Pyles' post.
Do you have a question or are you just being snarky? I obviously want Zain to win, but I am pointing out the case Yianni thinks he has.
Not snarky at all, just hoping you would elaborate, you sound like you may have been there and I am curious what actuall happened
Thx for info
Is the appeal over? I assume they can’t deliberate for this long
It's not over yet it will be determined at a later date.If they need match 3 it would probably happen with Dake vs Dieringer.Not sure I see that as 1 sequence but I guess time will tell.Cody asked to challenge the first exchange after he threw the block he didn't think the 2 and 2 was the correct callIs the appeal over? I assume they can’t deliberate for this long
Wait, I thought the proper appeal for freestyle was to disrobe down to your undies in the middle of the mat. Or is that only for international matches?According to Koll...…..as soon as they determine who to file the appeal
with.....they will do so on Monday. He also mentioned that nobody there knew how to appeal or whom to appeal to. My favorite was to the effect that "5,000 people saw it one way and two officials saw it the opposite" Also mentioned that some refs should never be on the mat. Stay tuned
Wait, I thought the proper appeal for freestyle was to disrobe down to your undies in the middle of the mat. Or is that only for international matches?
I will laugh until it hurts if Koll's appeal is denied because he missed the deadline.Is the appeal over? I assume they can’t deliberate for this long
Was the final of Zains match 6-6 or 8-8?
Wait, I thought the proper appeal for freestyle was to disrobe down to your undies in the middle of the mat. Or is that only for international matches?
So let me see if I got the Cliff Notes version down:
Zain asked Cael to throw the brick cause he thought he had exposure at the end to make it 8-8 (there's 0% chance he had the initial exposure in mind when he signaled) and thus he effectively wins on criteria.
He didn't get exposure at the end but because Zain's shot led to an insane minute long scramble, the referee had discretion to look at the entire minute where Zain never appeared to get exposed but there is argument also Yianni initiated the roll off the shot.
But to summarize my ultimate thoughts, man Freestyle can be so exciting at the cost of being so confusing as well.
Great, now someone will post a picture of 2 beer bellied 3/4 naked Mongolians
What are ya, a gymnomongophobist?Great, now someone will post a picture of 2 beer bellied 3/4 naked Mongolians
This is why the basic premise of freestyle is stupid .... scoring without control
And hard to score. I still don't see how the opening sequence in the 2nd match was scored 4-4. After Zain's opening 4 point move they roll thru twice so both are exposed with boy guys having a hold on the other and yet Yianni gets 2 points twice and Zain gets none? Baffling.
If I saw the scoring correctly, Mat Official went 2 Blue, Judge saw it 2 Red. At that point I believe the scoring sequence can’t stay 2-2, the Mat Chairperson has to vote with the Mat Official or the Judge or have a majority to score it 2-2.
I don’t think Yianni will have any recourse with a protest.
The correct score would then have to be posted with the Mat Chair voting either 2 Red(Judge) or 2 Blue ( Mat Official) or a discussion with majority voting 2-2 before timing of challenge would come into play. Cael would have 5 seconds from that being done and score board being officially updated in which to challenge, if there was a need to challenge based on how the Mat Chair decided to resolve the conflicting scores. So that’s why they went back 45 seconds as they HAD to resolve that.
This situation is the perfect example of my problem with freestyle, no control exposure. Scoring is totally at the discretion of the refs and as we all know that 100 people will have 100 different opinions of who should get what. It just leaves too much to subjectivity. In regard to what 2 Russian officials would rule on this match, I think they would probably declare that a Russian won even though neither wrestler was Russian.Is there really a precedent for the review officials to be over turned and another match awarded? Does USA freestyle wrestling really want to go there?
So confusing the rules are that the flo guys announcing seem to back and forth often with both guys can seeing it different. Those guys say I don't know a ton. Not throwing dirt on them. As an experiment I'd like to see 2 Russian officials that have not seen the match give us a score.
From the rule book:
During a bout, when the coach considers that a blatant refereeing mistake has been made against his wrestler and calls for a challenge, the mat chairman must wait for the action to go to neutral and stop the match. The refereeing delegate (or his substitute) and the mat chairman must review the video evidence. If the refereeing delegate (or his substitute) agrees that the refereeing body was right, the mat chairman must make sure that no other challenge will be granted to the wrestler in question during the remaining of the match. After the review of the video evidence, the refereeing delegate (or his substitute) solely renders its decision. Its decision is final and cannot be challenged.