I don’t mean to be ignorant, but am I to understand that the Iowa fans that post on here are saying Iowa and Penn State have not wrestled when not scheduled by the Big Ten for the reason that Penn State won’t pay for airfare?
Really?
I don’t mean to be ignorant, but am I to understand that the Iowa fans that post on here are saying Iowa and Penn State have not wrestled when not scheduled by the Big Ten for the reason that Penn State won’t pay for airfare?
Really?
Additional.As far as Brands addressing this, he has acknowledged he owes Cael a visit. He has never addressed why he could not be bothered reciprocating.
The reasoning was fairly obvious. The first opportunity Brands had to reciprocate PSU's visit was one of those years that PSU was going to just snot kick Iowa all over the place. Brands was very aware it would be a BJC event and prime time BTN broadcast and there was no way he was going to allow Iowa to take that beatdown in such a public forum. Always remember, Tom Brands only likes tough wrestling when his guys are the obvious bullies.
What Brands did wrong is dependent upon what Brands told Swafford.And you wrongfully put it on Kem. He was ready enough to beat the guy who recently beat Swafford. What did either Kem or Brands do wrong? You feel the need to blame one of them when the correct wrestler was on the mat Friday.
Ok, so I get your point, but the quibble is over semantics. You maintain PSU hasn’t won an on-the-mat competition vs. Iowa in 2 years, which is correct. NittanyChris maintains that the only part of that streak that matters is the 1 National Championship, which is hardly a streak (and also correct). Another contention is that we enjoy winning everything but at the end of the day really only care aboot the National Championship, which is also correct.
Additional.
The year Iowa owed PSU a reciprocal the two sides were in agreement to wrestle, but neither side would agree to travel to the other's site.
Penn State for obvious reasons, Iowa's reasons are not nearly as obvious. Well, other than fear of the snot kicking.
And no one on this board knows the answerWhat Brands did wrong is dependent upon what Brands told Swafford.
Has anybody take to Twitter to tell Mrs. Grey that with Koll at the helm Cornell lost to Lehigh about once a decade.Cornell was training through....had the flu....rona recovery....finals week....bad storms....girlfriend problems....
Nope. The Swafford family does, and they aren't impressed with Tom's integrity. Probably just a mis communication.And no one on this board knows the answer
And no one on this board knows the answer
Nope. The Swafford family does, and they aren't impressed with Tom's integrity. Probably just a mis communication.
Not sure what your point is. He loves being a Hawk, proclaims support for his teammates. Forward me the one where he acknowledges his misunderstanding of what Brands had told him.
I myself had often wondered about how this lasting punchline about Iowa/Brands supposedly owing a trip to State College came about so I did some legwork. Here's what I have found:
Starting my search in 2000, Iowa and PSU wrestled and rotated every year until 2011, 6 home and 6 away matches with PSU hosting in 2011. In 2012, PSU hosted again, making in two in a row for PSU. The next year,(2013)they were not scheduled, which led to Brands and Cael having a twitter convo(below) in which Tom brought up that PSU owed them "two in a row", which Cael agreed and Iowa hosted.
Following years:
2014-Iowa
2015 -PSU
2016 - no match
2017 - Iowa
2018 - PSU
2019 - no match
2020 - Iowa
2021 - canceled - scheduled at PSU
Not sure what your point is. He loves being a Hawk, proclaims support for his teammates. Forward me the one where he acknowledges his misunderstanding of what Brands had told him.
Show me where the Swafford family states they are not impressed with Tom’s integrity.Not sure what your point is. He loves being a Hawk, proclaims support for his teammates. Forward me the one where he acknowledges his misunderstanding of what Brands had told him.
Apology? I heard he pulled a knife on Mr. Brands this morning!I suspect Brands told him he might pull his scholarship if he doesn't shape up. Voila an apology.
I hate that the actions of the kid's well-intentioned brother forced him to have to do this publicly. Praying we don't have a similar Uncle Tony moment at PSU this season. 🙏 Family. Can't live with them, can't bury them in the backyard.
You can, but society frowns upon it.I hate that the actions of the kid's well-intentioned brother forced him to have to do this publicly. Praying we don't have a similar Uncle Tony moment at PSU this season. 🙏 Family. Can't live with them, can't bury them in the backyard.
I Know! Those damned camera cellphones have ruined all the fun ..........#F$@kwitnessesYou can, but society frowns upon it.
Ummm did you not see the Swafford family literally saying it’s the worst they’ve ever been F’ed over by someone in their lives? How did you miss this?Show me where the Swafford family states they are not impressed with Tom’s integrity.
Depends on the competition…high jump or limbo?Okay. Brands is better than a bowl of doo doo. Happy now? #Lowaspirations
The whole family shares a Twitter page? I missed thatUmmm did you not see the Swafford family literally saying it’s the worst they’ve ever been F’ed over by someone in their lives? How did you miss this?
Good research — but what was Brands’s basis for PSU “owing” Iowa 2 in a row? Was it because the B1G scheduled ‘11 and ‘12 to be at PSU? Or was there some sort of off-the-record arrangement where Iowa agreed to go to PSU in ‘12 to accommodate some need of PSU elsewhere in its scheduling? I don’t know the answer . . . but the butt-hurt on our end has been that PSU and Iowa have not wrestled every year as was anticipated after the ‘13 partnership. The perception is that Brands has declined to meet non-conference in the ‘16 and ‘19 off-years.I myself had often wondered about how this lasting punchline about Iowa/Brands supposedly owing a trip to State College came about so I did some legwork. Here's what I have found:
Starting my search in 2000, Iowa and PSU wrestled and rotated every year until 2011, 6 home and 6 away matches with PSU hosting in 2011. In 2012, PSU hosted again, making in two in a row for PSU. The next year,(2013)they were not scheduled, which led to Brands and Cael having a twitter convo(below) in which Tom brought up that PSU owed them "two in a row", which Cael agreed and Iowa hosted.
Following years:
2014-Iowa
2015 -PSU
2016 - no match
2017 - Iowa
2018 - PSU
2019 - no match
2020 - Iowa
2021 - canceled - scheduled at PSU
As best as I can tell, the only discussion about the years where they weren't scheduled to wrestle (13,16,19) happened in 13. That year sure seems like it was understood between the two coaches that it would be in Iowa City to make up for the back to back years at PSU(11, 12).
It's possible that it happened, but I couldn't find any info about the two coaches having conversations in 16 or 19 to set up a dual. If anyone has that info, it would be very helpful...
Otherwise, my best guess is that over time, people only remembered that Cael and Tom worked together to schedule a meet when they were not on the schedule in 13, and that it was in Iowa City. Therefore, the next time they were not scheduled, it should happen and at PSU. However, if you look at what was actually discussed, the one and only time they did this, it was clear to both coaches that this was a make-up dual in Iowa City and the hosting was back to even...
Duals aren’t important so it shouldn’t be a big deal.Good research — but what was Brands’s basis for PSU “owing” Iowa 2 in a row? Was it because the B1G scheduled ‘11 and ‘12 to be at PSU? Or was there some sort of off-the-record arrangement where Iowa agreed to go to PSU in ‘12 to accommodate some need of PSU elsewhere in its scheduling? I don’t know the answer . . . but the butt-hurt on our end has been that PSU and Iowa have not wrestled every year as was anticipated after the ‘13 partnership. The perception is that Brands has declined to meet non-conference in ‘16 and ‘19 off-years.
Maybe fans are making assumptions about how one-sided it is, but I think I recall a prominent Iowa poster saying some years back that Brands wasn’t about to give Cael the time of day after the binder had been delivered. Brands was “pissed” about what he learned in the binder and was done collaborating with the enemy.
Maybe just BS, but the fact remains that only one non-conference meeting between the teams has happened since the B1G adopted its ridiculous rotation, and it involver PSU going to Iowa. If that made some older history “even”, that’s all fine and good — but it’s still been Iowa’s turn to come here for a non-conference matchup in an off year. We’re still waiting.
I agree. If Iowa won't come to State College, then forget them, let's focus on teams that want our attention.Duals aren’t important so it shouldn’t be a big deal.
Why blame the Big10? The Big10 never had any objection with TnT following through on their commitment to return the favor of the next match being held at Penn State. Nitlion6 is absolutely correct, Brands, at that point in time, could not afford a monumental beat down and the resultant negative impact on recruiting.So no blame on the Big 10? Would have been easily solved.
I agree. If Iowa won't come to State College, then forget them, let's focus on teams that want our attention.
So you’re good with the Big 10 scheduling decisions? Then you shouldn’t have any complaints about not wrestling every year.Why blame the Big10? The Big10 never had any objection with TnT following through on their commitment to return the favor of the next match being held at Penn State. Nitlion6 is absolutely correct, Brands, at that point in time, could not afford a monumental beat down and the resultant negative impact on recruiting.
I saw that typo a few mins later and wondered if anyone would catch it. Then I wondered if anyone might think it wasn’t actually a typo, but that I was trying to crack some sort of Canadian joke.I didn't know you were Canadian.
I was waiting for you to try that. Although I suspect you already know the difference, I’ll say it anyway . . . The outcome of duals isn’t important in the grand scheme of things for a team and its historical prowess. The entertainment value of duals, on the other hand, is important to fans and their engagement in the sport. It’s why people make such a big deal not so much about which teams wins but, rather, who from each team actually participates.Duals aren’t important so it shouldn’t be a big deal.
Big10 scheduling is out of all our control, but Brands definitely had control over not following through on his commitment. When this agreement was originally made, the stated intend of Cael and Brands was to make sure the two teams wrestled every year, in spite of Big10 scheduling. Unfortunately it fell apart, because Brands didn’t keep his end of the bargain. If you’re looking for someone to blame on why Penn State and Iowa don’t wrestle every year, Brands is your guy.So you’re good with the Big 10 scheduling decisions? Then you shouldn’t have any complaints about not wrestling every year.
I was waiting for you to try that. Although I suspect you already know the difference, I’ll say it anyway . . . The outcome of duals isn’t important in the grand scheme of things for a team and its historical prowess. The entertainment value of duals, on the other hand, is important to fans and their engagement in the sport. It’s why people make such a big deal not so much about which teams wins but, rather, who from each team actually participates.
Context matters.
Based on this boards perception it would probably be a better match up.So long Iowa, hello Buffalo.
I wouldn’t be surprised if neither Swafford nor Brands knows the answer, either. Sometimes Brands starts down a train of thought and everyone be likeAnd no one on this board knows the answer
John C Reilly provides the best gifs!I wouldn’t be surprised if neither Swafford nor Brands knows the answer, either. Sometimes Brands starts down a train of thought and everyone be like
I always thought what made Cass really special was he was a very nimble bear at 270. He moved very well and used his weight often to take another heavy straight to his back. He was very good at putting his full weight on another heavy to keep them down.fwiw, i agree with him. i posted a more detailed explanation on HR in the grades thread, but to sum up, my concern is that instead of being the best version of big tony, he's made himself an inferior version of parris or kerk. i'd pick kerk today.
IIRC, Kerk had no issues getting out from under Wood or Schultz last year. Ironically, Schultz just dominated him on the feet. I don't think he necessarily struggles under size, there's more to it than just being big.I was looking forward to the Wood and Schultz matches as a barometer of how he did on bottom against really, really big dudes. Unfortunately neither match happened.
Maybe his serious blood infection had something to do with his “struggles” last year. Just a thoughtIIRC, Kerk had no issues getting out from under Wood or Schultz last year. Ironically, Schultz just dominated him on the feet. I don't think he necessarily struggles under size, there's more to it than just being big.