Not a fan of this at all, time to move on we won’t be going anywhere again next year 5 loses here we come
Will CV get an opportunity to start or play more? I am not confident in that prospect.Not to ruffle any feathers but people are actually claiming CV is ready to hit the portal now?? This is the same football player that has played a total of 3 quarters of football in the past 3 years and it was against a bad Rutgers team and now he’s going to be feel he should be playing more and thus needs to transfer? Maybe he knows Cliff is injury prone and he will play in 2022. Maybe he does hit the portal, who knows, but let’s not pretend he’s a proven player off 3 quarters against Rutgers. He can have a shot to win the job in 2023 just like the other 2 qb’s.
Roberson…well that’s another story.
Do you really think Clifford, Veilleux, Allar, and Pribula will all get a chance to play?That should be a nice bridge for the younger guys. Hopefully the two QBs who will be competing in 2023 will see more play time next year to season them for the starter competition.
Yes but without Clifford you are looking at potentially 3 losses by October 1st. The prospects for next year just got a lot better.There should be THREE QB's competing to play in 2023, Veilleux, Allar, and Pribula.
But with Clifford coming back it would not surprise me if one or more of the aforementioned young QB's is not on the PSU roster by 2023.
Unless Clifford takes the 2022 team to the 4 team playoff, this is a bust for the future of the QB position at PSU.
And I would be extremely surprised if Franklin deviated from his past habit of not playing the 2nd team QB more than a few snaps in the entire season, unless the first string QB suffers a serious injury. That is, only the 2nd team QB. And this past season the only reason that Veilleux played after beginning the season as the 3rd team QB was that he beat out Roberson to be the 2nd team QB. So on paper if anyone believes that 1 or more of Veilleux, Allar, or Pribula has a higher ceiling than what we have seen from Clifford, then Clifford's coming back can't help but stifle the QB development that is necessary to have a young QB, potentially more talented than Clifford, hit the ground running for 2023.
I don't believe the prospects for next season got better. Veilleux, in a limited sample of playing time, was more accurate and had better pocket awareness than Clifford has shown the last 2 seasons. So I don't believe starting a young, talented QB, Veilleux or whoever possibly would beat him out of Pribula or Allar, is throwing away a season. Did oh-high-ya throw away their season by starting Stroud? No. Starting young, talented QB's is the nature of top 20 college football now. And making a judgment or statement that starting a young and talented QB is throwing away a season seems irrational.Yes but without Clifford you are looking at potentially 3 losses by October 1st. The prospects for next year just got a lot better.
Even with Clifford back I think there’s a decent chance the 2023 QB starter is playing a lot of football by the end of the 2022 season. Regardless, no coach would throw away a 2022 season just to be better prepared for 2023.
Do those who don't want Clifford back to make way for "can't miss" QB Allar have amnesia? Do they remember "can't miss" Hackenberg? "Can't miss" Bolden? "Can't miss" Morelli?
Clifford coming back is great for the program. A good, experienced QB returning for another year is always a good thing. And spare me the transfer portal, free agent nonsense. That's for the SEC sewers of the world.
Do those who don't want Clifford back to make way for "can't miss" QB Allar have amnesia? Do they remember "can't miss" Hackenberg? "Can't miss" Bolden? "Can't miss" Morelli?
Clifford coming back is great for the program. A good, experienced QB returning for another year is always a good thing. And spare me the transfer portal, free agent nonsense. That's for the SEC sewers of the world.
You have to think Clifford is locked in as the starter. I've seen rumblings that Pribula might be moved to a Safety, but those are probably just rumors taken out of context.
Nevertheless, you have to think Roberson & Veilleux are both toast. Veilleux showed what he could do earlier this year and a smaller/mid-tier team could probably use his talents.
It will at least be nice for Allar to have a mentor for a year and learn the ropes, being primed for the 2023 sreason. Who is the 3rd strong though? Pribula right now, but if he does switch positions, who would it be?
Other teams seem to have no problem with OC turnaround.
Allar is the future, but a true freshman, any true freshman starting does not bode well. Redshirt a year and learn and let us shore up the Oline so he doesn't get killed when he starts in year 2.
I'm sorry Mrs. Roberson but your son isn't a division 1 quarterbackYou know that how? How many college practices and games has he been in? For all we know maybe he couldn’t even start at IUP.
Come on. Don’t insult Mrs. Roberson like that. 823 is a complete tool.I'm sorry Mrs. Roberson but your son isn't a division 1 quarterback
Ignore button works wonders on a tool like that.Come on. Don’t insult Mrs. Roberson like that. 823 is a complete tool.
Yep. I have already placed that person on ignore.Ignore button works wonders on a tool like that.
Hence CV in the portal soon.Allar is the future, but a true freshman, any true freshman starting does not bode well. Redshirt a year and learn and let us shore up the Oline so he doesn't get killed when he starts in year 2.
Sure. if he does. I don't think it's fair to say that CV outplayed a healthy SC though.What about Veilleux, who actually did outplay Clifford in his 3 quarters of play in 2021....?
Do those who don't want Clifford back to make way for "can't miss" QB Allar have amnesia? Do they remember "can't miss" Hackenberg? "Can't miss" Bolden? "Can't miss" Morelli?
Clifford coming back is great for the program. A good, experienced QB returning for another year is always a good thing. And spare me the transfer portal, free agent nonsense. That's for the SEC sewers of the world.
Correct. If Clifford doesn’t get hurt, even with our O weaknesses, this is a 11-1 or 10-2 team, and many more people would be thrilled he is coming back. However, he got hurt, season went sideways, and many are instead crying about it.Sure. if he does. I don't think it's fair to say that CV outplayed a healthy SC though.
What should happen if, for example, CV shows he is better all through spring practice and into fall practice?Correct. If Clifford doesn’t get hurt, even with our O weaknesses, this is a 11-1 or 10-2 team, and many more people would be thrilled he is coming back. However, he got hurt, season went sideways, and many are instead crying about it.
This is good news overall. He was the unquestioned MVP of this season. Having him at the top of the position group will hopefully keep the team above .500 in what looks like a rough rebuilding year depending on who leaves.I was ready to see what the kids can do. I guess this is good?
That depends on Franklin. He is well known for not allowing open competition at that particular position and going with his guy if he has any choice.What should happen if, for example, CV shows he is better all through spring practice and into fall practice?
What do you think WILL happen IF CV shows that?
Many of us were asking what the hell happened in 2020, and expected it to be a one off problem as we headed into 2021. Instead, 2021 looked eerily similar to 2020 so now people are asking have the wheels fallen off in the Penn State Football Program? Im very skeptical as to whether Franklin knows how to improve things.Correct. If Clifford doesn’t get hurt, even with our O weaknesses, this is a 11-1 or 10-2 team, and many more people would be thrilled he is coming back. However, he got hurt, season went sideways, and many are instead crying about it.
two of the young guns get to play one sits. The key is for this team to occasionally put a beat down on teams which we have done rarely in the past two years. One of the downsides of playing 9 games in the B10 AND scheduling a team like Auburn. Not enough powerpuff games to get the young players feet wet.Do you really think Clifford, Veilleux, Allar, and Pribula will all get a chance to play?
This is good news overall. He was the unquestioned MVP of this season. Having him at the top of the position group will hopefully keep the team above .500 in what looks like a rough rebuilding year depending on who leaves.
Definitely not down in Austin. They wear knee pads down here for the burnt OrangeIs there another program that has to deal with beat reporters such as Giger, Rudel, Jones, and Flounders who despise the team they cover? I dont follow other programs, so thats a serious question.
If Clifford gets some protection from his line, he is really good.I understand that having an older QB with all that experience probably gives us the best shot at winning. However, I'm still disappointed as I never thought Clifford had "IT" like McSorely did. I was ready to move on and it makes it more likely that we will lose at least one of the young guys. Hopefully, it's not Allar. While we might think a redshirt year would be best for him, the kid may have had his heart set on the starting job in 2022.
Well, JVP played upperclassmen to a fault. JF has a much better track record of playing Freshmen. Honest question, what backup QB do you think should have started during JF's tenure?I would say that the reluctance of some fans to have Clifford back really means they think the following:
"Well Clifford is starting no matter what the incoming guys do."
And that's the real problem. To me, Clifford has been a good player, a good representative. He's welcome back. But CJF must play whoever is the best at that time.
No one trusts him to do that. Unfortunately.
The problem here is that Franklin tends to play the starter deep into blowouts.Pretty amazing we have gone 11-10 in the past two years, now predicting a ~0.500 season and we added another million to JF compensation.
I suspect that CV was not, and is not currently, as good as Sean Clifford.Well, JVP played upperclassmen to a fault. JF has a much better track record of playing Freshmen. Honest question, what backup QB do you think should have started during JF's tenure?
Maybe he isn’t but he was a four-star recruit also. If anything he proves that you have no clue with these two freshman will be.I'm sorry Mrs. Roberson but your son isn't a division 1 quarterback
Clifford is ****ing good. End of story.
I actually wish he would portal somewhere and come back and kick our asses so people get a little more realistic of who we are.
where it stands right now, a three year starter and finishing in the top 5 of every an category. And one of those years was the stupid covid year.
Clifford is going to be the best option under center when the season starts. Probably by a long shot. The problem is that nobody on this board will believe it.What should happen if, for example, CV shows he is better all through spring practice and into fall practice?
What do you think WILL happen IF CV shows that?
I would say that the reluctance of some fans to have Clifford back really means they think the following:
"Well Clifford is starting no matter what the incoming guys do."
And that's the real problem. To me, Clifford has been a good player, a good representative. He's welcome back. But CJF must play whoever is the best at that time.
No one trusts him to do that. Unfortunately.
I think it’s worth pointing out that Clifford got his initial starting job over an older QB in Stevens.Well, JVP played upperclassmen to a fault. JF has a much better track record of playing Freshmen. Honest question, what backup QB do you think should have started during JF's tenure?