No Kimura??? Just guessing.Care to summarize?
I haven't seen a lot of BBs matches but it certainly seemed like he wasn't crazy about shooting to his right. Is that a norm for him?Tal Shahar and McNeil both look like studs at the next level. Bartlett as well. Would have liked to see more action from BB in the first period to avoid the 1 move/1 mistake fate. Anyone know a guy who can get wrestlers to open up their offense?
Dear stupid person.I've had this debate with you before. To say he was "wrestling for a stall call" because he looks at the ref as he gets run out of bounds (obvious stalling) is ridiculous. You could find a clip of every PSU wrestler doing the same thing.
You made a claim based on emotion and hatred for Iowa. Tons of posters, including Penn State fans, pointed out that your claim is unbelievably stupid. Now you're doubling down with the only thing you could find: two brief looks at the ref as Lewis runs him out of bounds on top, all while Marinelli is still working hard to escape. And you're somehow extrapolating that to the full 7 minute match where Marinelli fired off tons of attacks. Just stop.
"Non-Walsh Ironman" content to "Walsh Ironman" content ratio is comically wide.
So, that's what a Rivals ratio looks like."Non-Walsh Ironman" content to "Walsh Ironman" content ratio is comically wide.
You're trying to retroactively change your argument because you know you can't defend it. Here's what you first posted several months back:Dear stupid person.
Learn to read, or get someone to read and explain it for you.
Never, not once have I said Marinelli does not wrestle hard. He still was looking for that stall call. The point i was making when you were babbling your simplistic BS was Marinelli did during match with Lewis, while wrestling, look for the stall call. Simple enough, 0 - 0, second period Lewis has a warning and at the conclusion of the first two starts Marinelli is looking for a given point. That is the same point being made here.
Your arguement against what I am saying is Marinelli wrestles hard, he shot more shots than Lewis and because you think that Lewis was in fact stalling when he chased Marinelli off the mat on the first start that all means Marinelli wasn't looking for a given stall call and point.
Honest to God I get linear thought is your limitation, but holly rip dude. There is no question what he was asking when turning his head and pleading with ref.
+1 THIS is how you debate. Leave the ad-hominem attacks at the door.Can I just say that I have no problem with a guy who is working hard in a match whispering, murmuring, looking, glancing, or even using ESP to communicate to an official that he should be thinking about a stall call?
Seriously, what's to criticize in that situation, when the complainant is legitimately working his butt off?
If people want to criticize the guys who just drive their opponents off
the mat, will not let them circle in, or simply act busy without any genuine attempt to score a TD or NF, go
for it. But Marinelli is not that kind of wrestler . . . and that remains true even if, somehow, it could be proven he wrestled a match that way on an occasion or two. Body of work.
Also, the name-calling and accusations of stupidity are uncalled for and just delegitimize anything said afterward. They bring nothing useful to an opinion or a debate.
+1 THIS is how you debate. Leave the ad-hominem attacks at the door.
So what is the Iowa styleYou're trying to retroactively change your argument because you know you can't defend it. Here's what you first posted several months back:
"Marinelli lost to Lewis because as a rule of thumb Iowa kids are trained to wrestle for stall calls and not to push the offense."
When people correctly pointed out that Marinelli shot the whole match, you then changed your argument to those shots don't count because they didn't work and therefore weren't serious (against one of the best defensive specialists in the country no less).
Then when people pointed out how silly that argument was, you changed it to Marinelli looking at the ref while getting driven out of bounds, while in the process of working for an escape (which he got). He then continued to attack and did not ask for a stall call in any other situation.
Your argument is unserious and fueled by an emotional disdain for Iowa. It's okay. That's what fans do. You don't have to keep doubling down. Everybody can see it for what it is.
I have asked this question over on HR several times. I was given a wide array of opinions. Also was given many different examples of wrestlers that in my opion wrestled different style.So what is the Iowa style
So what is the Iowa style
Just something that sounds cool to say..
Agree 100 percent. Well done!I'm sure when "Iowa style" is mentioned, most people think heavy hands, constant forward pressure, elite conditioning, brawlers more so than technicians. Basically, they think Gable era teams.
Truth is though, there is no single style that could accurately describe Iowa wrestling(past or present)or PSU, or any other team.
Joe Williams, Mark Perry, McGinness, Brinzer, etc all had their own unique style that wouldn't really fall under the above description.
Look at this year's team. No two starters have the same style. Spencer loves to rack up near falls. Kem is relentlessly attacking from the opening whistle. Lugo is a grinder. Marinelli is as physical as they come. Desanto is all about pace. No single style encompasses the team, and never will.
I remember Jim Gibbons discussing this back at the beginning of the PSU dynasty. His words and I'm paraphrasing were along the lines that Iowa and other schools need to change their style. In context, he was bringing up a philosophy or mental approach to wrestling. I think it's safe to say that some wrestlers are more offensive but in college they become less offensive. The competition is more equal. Having said this I have watched Iowa and others wrestle the same way they always have. The emphasis is not on a bonus it's more about winning the match and there are a ton of wrestlers who are perfectly ok with that. That's not to say that Lee, Kemmerer, and Marinelli wrestle that way but most of the Iowa kids do. They have heave hands and they push forward not really looking to attack or bonus their opponent. I recognize that it's far to simplistic to associate a style with a given program based on diversity of wrestlers in said program but you can't help but wonder when you watch a majority of the kids in that program wrestle that wayI'm sure when "Iowa style" is mentioned, most people think heavy hands, constant forward pressure, elite conditioning, brawlers more so than technicians. Basically, they think Gable era teams.
Truth is though, there is no single style that could accurately describe Iowa wrestling(past or present)or PSU, or any other team.
Joe Williams, Mark Perry, McGinness, Brinzer, etc all had their own unique style that wouldn't really fall under the above description.
Look at this year's team. No two starters have the same style. Spencer loves to rack up near falls. Kem is relentlessly attacking from the opening whistle. Lugo is a grinder. Marinelli is as physical as they come. Desanto is all about pace. No single style encompasses the team, and never will.
The apocalypse is upon us! JSS is getting along with a Hawkeye. What's next, Matter and a Rutgers fan?Agree 100 percent. Well done!
The apocalypse is upon us! JSS is getting along with a Hawkeye. What's next, Matter and a Rutgers fan?[/QUOTEIt
The apocalypse is upon us! JSS is getting along with a Hawkeye. What's next, Matter and a Rutgers fan?
The apocalypse is upon us! JSS is getting along with a Hawkeye. What's next, Matter and a Rutgers fan?
This is a very good explanation. "Iowa Style" was always an attitude/approach, not a set of techniques. It was about relentless work ethic and big heart during matches. Hawkeyes were famous for breaking opponents with their pace.I'm sure when "Iowa style" is mentioned, most people think heavy hands, constant forward pressure, elite conditioning, brawlers more so than technicians. Basically, they think Gable era teams.
Truth is though, there is no single style that could accurately describe Iowa wrestling(past or present)or PSU, or any other team.
Joe Williams, Mark Perry, McGinness, Brinzer, etc all had their own unique style that wouldn't really fall under the above description.
Look at this year's team. No two starters have the same style. Spencer loves to rack up near falls. Kem is relentlessly attacking from the opening whistle. Lugo is a grinder. Marinelli is as physical as they come. Desanto is all about pace. No single style encompasses the team, and never will.
It comes down to recruiting. If there were 100 Jason Nolfs out there, every top program would have 10. Cael has recruited better athletes who wrestle, as opposed to wrestlers.I remember Jim Gibbons discussing this back at the beginning of the PSU dynasty. His words and I'm paraphrasing were along the lines that Iowa and other schools need to change their style. In context, he was bringing up a philosophy or mental approach to wrestling. I think it's safe to say that some wrestlers are more offensive but in college they become less offensive. The competition is more equal. Having said this I have watched Iowa and others wrestle the same way they always have. The emphasis is not on a bonus it's more about winning the match and there are a ton of wrestlers who are perfectly ok with that. That's not to say that Lee, Kemmerer, and Marinelli wrestle that way but most of the Iowa kids do. They have heave hands and they push forward not really looking to attack or bonus their opponent. I recognize that it's far to simplistic to associate a style with a given program based on diversity of wrestlers in said program but you can't help but wonder when you watch a majority of the kids in that program wrestle that way
Dang, heck, and shoot? Happy?When Roar curses, makes a prediction, or offends someone, then I will know the end is near.
He offends me using those words, and he always predicts that the wrestlers will be their best versions of themselves and have fun. So, sign of the end times?Dang, heck, and shoot? Happy?
"Dang, heck, and what????"---Sam StollDang, heck, and shoot? Happy?
Lol. Theres actually a few I get along with but jrod is one of the best out there for sure.The apocalypse is upon us! JSS is getting along with a Hawkeye. What's next, Matter and a Rutgers fan?
Lol. Theres actually a few I get along with but jrod is one of the best out there for sure.
Aw shucks, now I'm blushing.
Did we just become best friends....
Ok new game...Hey, now, I thought we had a good thing going . . .
When John Brooks posts insights about AB an angel gets its wings.When Roar curses, makes a prediction, or offends someone, then I will know the end is near.
Ok new game...
F
Marry
Kill
IronBird, WeH8 & Gripp?
FMKOk new game...
F
Marry
Kill
IronBird, WeH8 & Gripp?
Could be more f** just to do the combinationsFMK
Spyker
Brushwood
Guns
or
FMK
Jammen
Creedo
Vodka
We could have an entire thread for this.Could be more f** just to do the combinations
Edit: this is cracking me up. man there really has been a cast of characters around here the last decade
I didn't change my arguement. He was wanting that stall call and point. Just my opinion, but if you are looking to score a stall call (point) your focus may be off.You're trying to retroactively change your argument because you know you can't defend it. Here's what you first posted several months back:
"Marinelli lost to Lewis because as a rule of thumb Iowa kids are trained to wrestle for stall calls and not to push the offense."
When people correctly pointed out that Marinelli shot the whole match, you then changed your argument to those shots don't count because they didn't work and therefore weren't serious (against one of the best defensive specialists in the country no less).
Then when people pointed out how silly that argument was, you changed it to Marinelli looking at the ref while getting driven out of bounds, while in the process of working for an escape (which he got). He then continued to attack and did not ask for a stall call in any other situation.
Your argument is unserious and fueled by an emotional disdain for Iowa. It's okay. That's what fans do. You don't have to keep doubling down. Everybody can see it for what it is.