One can always internally justify choosing money. The more difficult decision is rejecting the money.
Maybe "not" in this case, but generally speaking when facing a tough decisions, the more courageous path is usually the moral, correct, right path. It's the temptation and ease that makes the alternative so attractive, which of course confounds wisdom and blurrs the decision making process.
As for Iowa and the now second or 3rd case (Real) of using a (in their words) slush fund to fill their gaps. I say be careful what you wish for. Eventually the unintended consequences will surface. I see discord amongst the ranks right around the corner.