Robbie can beat both Ayala and DeAugustino. That's a fact.Sounds bout right.. unless Howard is healthy then he’s going to win that.. Griffith might got a shot
Robbie can beat both Ayala and DeAugustino. That's a fact.Sounds bout right.. unless Howard is healthy then he’s going to win that.. Griffith might got a shot
Are you talking about a full size Robbie or a mini Robbie?Robbie can beat both Ayala and DeAugustino. That's a fact.
Mini Robbie tech fall over both.Are you talking about a full size Robbie or a mini Robbie?
Welcome to the fraternity bruh!Robbie can beat both Ayala and DeAugustino. That's a fact.
The first step is recognizing it lol. I get it though, I have a friend who is very cautious about any predictions with wrestling. And the guy at nationals, saying, well, we can't have 8 national champions.Slushhead was correct by the way.
1. Yes, I am nuts.
2. I bleed Blue and White and for 51 weeks of the season I am very similar to the rest of yinz: I'm positive and I'm encouraging.
3. During Nattys I completely lose my mind and go full on paranoid and complain about anyone not scoring huge points or over shooting their seed.
Why can't we? Assuming Starocci & Brooks are back and not out on ORS:The first step is recognizing it lol. I get it though, I have a friend who is very cautious about any predictions with wrestling. And the guy at nationals, saying, well, we can't have 8 national champions.
We both air on the side of caution or enthusiasm.
My cautious friend? He did agree he sees a path for 8 finalists after the recent transfers. If he sees a chance it's not crazy talk.Why can't we? Assuming Starocci & Brooks are back and not out on ORS:
174, 197, HWT: clear favorites
157, 184: top 2 and close to 50-50 to win, only takes one great match...
149: SVN needs to clear the Sasso hurdle, but it's doable.
133: Nagao is one of a small handful of legit contenders if Vito isn't Superhuman Vito next year
141: Bartlett is a solid AA and could be a contender if he continues the upward trajectory he showed at nationals, but he needs to jump at least Alirez and Woods
165: If Mesenbrink goes, who knows what his potential is. 165 will be a meat grinder again, but he is a wild card in there
125: Totally unknown, but wide open if Robbie is healthy.
There's a path to 8 in there somewhere. I'm not betting on it, but it's there.
We have our stuff in order, so not much to talk about. You guys are a circus, filled with bikini-clad fat chicks on mopeds. It's hard not to watch, let alone not talk about.There should be more Iowa Topics here.
I can't believe you don't mention Iowa like you used to. What gives?
My cautious friend? He did agree he sees a path for 8 finalists after the recent transfers. If he sees a chance it's not crazy talk.
If my buddy, he wrestled a little in college, thinks it's possible? I would say it is. imagine the meltdown next year lol.It's not hard to envision 8 wrestlers into the semis. After all, If Carter and Brooks are in the lineup, we will likely begin the season with 8 wrestlers ranked in the top 4.
With our record on Friday night, it's also easy to see a path for 8 into the finals ... just sayin.
Yep, I can see 8 finalists and PSU winning 4-6 in the tournament if everythin goes right. I could definitely see your scenario as plausible.8 National champs is more than a stretch, and a bit silly to talk about, granted there is a razor's edge wide path to do so.
Probably more incredible, and let's say 'doable' as there is a wider path to all 10 wrestlers finishing top 4. That would be epic, the stuff of legends, and cement this team as the best ever. Still a stretch, but.... WOW!
How about a thread to discuss the Over/Under on number of Hawkeye wrestlers who are involved in the gambling investigation? Too soon?There should be more Iowa Topics here.
I can't believe you don't mention Iowa like you used to. What gives?
I am thinking the O/U should be around three. I am taking the under and praying for the over.How about a thread to discuss the Over/Under on number of Hawkeye wrestlers who are involved in the gambling investigation? Too soon?
You pray for things like that?I am thinking the O/U should be around three. I am taking the under and praying for the over.
Yep!! I have even prayed for you on a couple occasions.You pray for things like that?
Does this kind of penalty burn eligibility?How about a thread to discuss the Over/Under on number of Hawkeye wrestlers who are involved in the gambling investigation? Too soon?
Correct - otherwise you can just get an extra redshirt by betting lol.Per Willie, if you are suspended for a year you lose your eligibility. So, if it is Cass or Woods they would be done for their career.
Oh my god, can you imagine? I legit hope that isn't the case, but damn the way this off season has gone...Per Willie, if you are suspended for a year you lose your eligibility. So, if it is Cass or Woods they would be done for their career.
It’s probably different due to legal betting outlets now, but I’m sure the rules were put in place to keep athletes from getting in too deep with unsavory people - and then being compromised going forward and perhaps asked to somehow “work off” your debt some way.Does this kind of penalty burn eligibility?
Just for examples same, if Cassi were found to have bet over $500 on Iowa football, and the NCAA issues a year suspension, does that simply ban him from team activities for a year, while extending his career a year, or does that burn a year?
Likewise if there is a half year suspension, I assume that means no practicing with the team in addition to missing out on half the duals?
My take any betting on pro sports is complete BS for the NCAA to get involved. I see zero difference than any non athlete student doing the same.
Once you get in to betting on your own team, your own sport, or other permutations of collegiate athletics, one can see the opportunity for collusion amongst athletes, and the integrity of the sport can be compromised.
If my buddy, he wrestled a little in college, thinks it's possible? I would say it is. imagine the meltdown next year lol.
I think the logic there is if an NCAA athlete gets into debt with a bookie betting on professional sports, then they are more susceptible to being convinced to fix a college game to settle their debt or to just flat out turn a big payday. While the rules are not perfect, they are still an attempt to protect the athlete (from themself).My take any betting on pro sports is complete BS for the NCAA to get involved. I see zero difference than any non athlete student doing the same.
Once you get in to betting on your own team, your own sport, or other permutations of collegiate athletics, one can see the opportunity for collusion amongst athletes, and the integrity of the sport can be compromised.
I mean we just had 7 this year ... so.Yep, I can see 8 finalists and PSU winning 4-6 in the tournament if everythin goes right. I could definitely see your scenario as plausible.
Wait...wouldn't that ruin wrestling as we know it lmfao8 National champs is more than a stretch, and a bit silly to talk about, granted there is a razor's edge wide path to do so.
Probably more incredible, and let's say 'doable' as there is a wider path to all 10 wrestlers finishing top 4. That would be epic, the stuff of legends, and cement this team as the best ever. Still a stretch, but.... WOW!
Not true. Researchers have found that some college athletes and coaches are much better than average at picking long shot bets that turn out to be winners. The best example is the current PSU coaching staff for the wrestling team. Ten national team titles in the last 12 years along with 30+ individual national titles. 😈I think the logic there is if an NCAA athlete gets into debt with a bookie betting on professional sports, then they are more susceptible to being convinced to fix a college game to settle their debt or to just flat out turn a big payday. While the rules are not perfect, they are still an attempt to protect the athlete (from themself).
This ... and I didn't even think of it from this point of view. Gambling addiction is very real and can ruin lives. It starts small always.I think the logic there is if an NCAA athlete gets into debt with a bookie betting on professional sports, then they are more susceptible to being convinced to fix a college game to settle their debt or to just flat out turn a big payday. While the rules are not perfect, they are still an attempt to protect the athlete (from themself).
I hadn't thought of it from that angle. Agreed. However; context is everything, and betting on fantasy football even if $500 shouldn't be the same category as the dark alley type. Too many areas of grey to navigate for the NCAA, hence the zero tolerance approach. You can't buy a new iPhone for $500. That is a number, even for a student that just seems far too low as well.I think the logic there is if an NCAA athlete gets into debt with a bookie betting on professional sports, then they are more susceptible to being convinced to fix a college game to settle their debt or to just flat out turn a big payday. While the rules are not perfect, they are still an attempt to protect the athlete (from themself).
There have been some point shaving scandals in men's hoops -- BC in the 1970s, Arizona State in the 1990s at least.I think the logic there is if an NCAA athlete gets into debt with a bookie betting on professional sports, then they are more susceptible to being convinced to fix a college game to settle their debt or to just flat out turn a big payday. While the rules are not perfect, they are still an attempt to protect the athlete (from themself).
I think they should get most of the credit for Gilman. He was a savage there and still is.He did come to the NLWC as a world silver medalist. I think the Hawks can claim some of the credit for his success. It is similar to how you guys take a lot of credit for the success of kids in college if they come from PA.
And even Bubba Jenkins admitted he was immature and didn’t handle everything right and gets why Cael had to do what he did. Mentioned Cael was setting the tone and maybe in another time frame, they could have worked.I think they should get most of the credit for Gilman. He was a savage there and still is.
However, they should also get credit for alienating him to the point where he leaves to go to their rivals. Just as they have done with DSJ, Metcalf, and several others. It’s actually mind boggling the talent they let leave that place. Other than Bubba Jenkins, I can’t think of a disgruntled former PSU wrestler. Can anyone else? All of our guys that leave and coach elsewhere have said great things about their time at PSU. Beard may possibly have a little bitterness but hasn’t publicly said anything that I know of.
Maybe Cruiseliner Nick because he always has a chip on his shoulder about something. But he does get along with his former PSU teammates.Other than Bubba Jenkins, I can’t think of a disgruntled former PSU wrestler. Can anyone else? All of our guys that leave and coach elsewhere have said great things about their time at PSU. Beard may possibly have a little bitterness but hasn’t publicly said anything that I know of.
Wrestlers are definitely involved. Question is who and what extent.I read an article on Iowa State about the gambling it didnt mention any iowa wrestlers involved in the gambling!
Right after the semi-finals a huge check was supposedly dropped in a portal and addressed to Coe College Administration.Wrestlers are definitely involved. Question is who and what extent.
Best Online Sportsbooks & Bonus Codes for December 2024 | Legal Sportsbook Reviews
The Action Network is the trusted source for the best legal US Online Sportsbooks. Read our expert reviews to find the best online sports betting sites in your state.www.actionnetwork.com