Part of this response may be driven by my pissed off, but with the Rutgers 125 pounder being stuck in a room that has shown minimal skills in development of elite talent i have to believe the gap between Spencer and the Rutgers' 125 pounder is already widening.Slight edge to Nick at Midlands. After that, the edge goes to Lee for the remainder of their NCAA careers. Should be some un matches to watch.
I get that and you have a point. I just can not get past the idea that Rutgers will change (is changing) the kid, not the kid change the Rutgers program.My main reason for giving Nick the slight edge now is that I'm convinced that he's fully rehabbed and in 3 period shape. I don't know if Spencer will be by the end of the month.
Slight edge to Nick at Midlands. After that, the edge goes to Lee for the remainder of their NCAA careers. Should be some #un matches to watch.
Well it is fairly well documented that NATO can struggle against Iowa kids.Agree 100%. I think Suriano beats the almighty S Lee at Midlands, after that it's practically a toss up with S Lee the slightest of faves.
NATO is a distant, and I do mean distant, third.
Agreed. Finally a common thought..Well it is fairly well documented that NATO can struggle against Iowa kids.
It isn't the first. We have similar thoughts on several topicsAgreed. Finally a common thought..
I miss the Era when Vodka stayed on HR.
Alright. I'll leave you to the circlejerk. See you after nationals.
Alright. I'll leave you to the circlejerk. See you after nationals.
Look u can shit on me bc I'm an Iowa fan. I can take it. But reread this very thread. You have some people saying that post is a sarcastic joke and other people saying that delusion HR posters hold that view. I point out the discrepancy and you guys say I'm the clueless one.
You can circlejerk each other all day. Doesn't change reality or facts.
Anyways let's get this post back on topic. I make one comment calling out BS and it derails the entire thread bc 15 ppl feel the need to quote respond to that one post.
Really hope to see Lee vs. Suriano at midlands. Lee looked outstanding at the UNI open but it's the UNI open.
Are there any guidelines for vulgar language on this board? Or is it anything goes?
By the tone and the language of this post, it certainly appears that anything goes. Is there some threshold that this poster approached but didn't cross?
No need to make martyrs here. Vodka just needs to get a life, not a ban.
Every day he posts, is another hole in the "BWI quick ban hammer" myth.Are there any guidelines for vulgar language on this board? Or is it anything goes?
By the tone and the language of this post, it certainly appears that anything goes. Is there some threshold that this poster approached but didn't cross?
His own board is getting sick of his rants."Ok I'm really leaving this time. No, really." --Yakov Smirnoff
No need to make martyrs here. Vodka just needs a hug, not a ban.
Widespread use of the Ignore button?Even if banishing someone isn't in the cards, I guess I'm asking if this language would typically generate a warning from the moderators. What if another poster decided to use equally vulgar language to tell him what he should do to himself? Would that also be acceptable? There has to be a line that can't be crossed for us to maintain a civil conversation, isn't there?
people use vulgar language on the BWI Forums all the time. Not sure if shit or circlejerk are ban worthy, imo not.Even if banishing someone isn't in the cards, I guess I'm asking if this language would typically generate a warning from the moderators. What if another poster decided to use equally vulgar language to tell him what he should do to himself? Would that also be acceptable? There has to be a line that can't be crossed for us to maintain a civil conversation, isn't there?
Alright. I'll leave you to the circlejerk. See you after nationals.
There is always the ignore optionI miss the Era when Vodka stayed on HR.
Question for y'all. I don't have anyone on ignore, but if I did, would I see all of the replies to the ignoree? I think that would drive me nuts.There is always the ignore option
You would, it does.Question for y'all. I don't have anyone on ignore, but if I did, would I see all of the replies to the ignoree? I think that would drive me nuts.
Is that when you will be back to explain to me why I did or did not stand to applaud Gavin(s', 's) victories and championships?Alright. I'll leave you to the circlejerk. See you after nationals.
Ok, thanks. No way I'm putting vodka on ignore though. His posts make me feel somewhat normal.You would, it does.
I don't have a ton on ignore. Spyker and any Sandusky dimwit.
A strong argument for sobriety.Ok, thanks. No way I'm putting vodka on ignore though. His posts make me feel somewhat normal.
people use vulgar language on the BWI Forums all the time. Not sure if shit or circlejerk are ban worthy, imo not.
but if you don't like it, the thing to do is hit the Report button
Is there a way of knowing how many (no names) folks are ignoring you? Part of me will be disappointed with myself if I'm not ignored by at least one person.
Is ignoring yourself an option? Not that I can see, but it appears that I can self-report to the Moderator.
Calling out BS from a long standing joke....is in and of itself BS. Your new, you'll get a longer leash, but do try to catch up quickly.
And it is a talent they are very good at, and proudly displayOne great feature of freedom of speech is that it allows idiots to self-identify.
Catch up or touch up?You need to catch up on your grammar before you post dumb shit.