Attacks on Electrical Substations Raise Alarm​

3
Michael Levenson
Sat, February 4, 2023, 11:21 AM EST·5 min read



A work crew at an electrical substation, one of two where damage from gunfire disrupted service in Moore County, N.C., Dec. 5, 2022. (Kate Medley/The New York Times)
A recent spate of attacks on electrical substations in North Carolina and other states has underscored the continued vulnerability of the nation’s electrical grid, according to experts who warn that the power system has become a prime target for right-wing extremists.
Over the past three months, at least nine substations have been attacked in North Carolina, Washington state and Oregon, cutting power to tens of thousands of people. After those attacks, federal regulators ordered a review of security standards for the electrical system.
The FBI on Friday said that it was offering two $25,000 rewards for information that leads to the conviction of those responsible for shooting and damaging two substations in Moore County, North Carolina, on Dec. 3 and for shooting at another substation in Randolph County, North Carolina, on Jan. 17. The Moore County attack caused 45,000 people to lose power, some for five days.
Concerned about the sabotage, legislators in North Carolina, South Carolina and Arizona have introduced bills that would require 24-hour security at substations or toughen penalties for damaging them.
The proposals represent the latest efforts to protect the grid since 2013, when a sniper attack on a power station in California raised alarms across the industry. Experts say that it inspired others to plot similar attacks.
Because they house transformers that transfer power from region to region, the tens of thousands of substations across the country represent the most vulnerable nodes in the nation’s vast electrical grid, said Jon Wellinghoff, a former chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
While federal rules require utilities to periodically review security at the most critical substations, many smaller substations in rural areas remain protected by little more than chain-link fencing, security cameras and lighting, Wellinghoff said. That leaves them vulnerable to rifle attacks, he said.
Wellinghoff said he was worried about more shootings like the one in Moore County as well as larger plots against a “finite number” of substations nationwide, which, if disabled, would knock out power in half the country.
“The risk is continued disruption of our economic system in our country — not only that, but there’s also lives at stake,” Wellinghoff said, noting that people rely on electricity for heat and medical equipment.
Manny Cancel, CEO of the Electricity Information Sharing and Analysis Center, a clearinghouse for information about threats against the electrical system, said that cyberattacks were more likely to cause widespread outages than guns and explosives.
“I do think there is a level of protection, of resilience, that’s built into the grid,” Cancel said. The question is, he said, “Is there more that we should do?”
While regulators have long worried about terrorism at substations, there is concern among national security officials and researchers that the stations have become attractive targets for right-wing extremists in particular.
From 2016 to 2022, white supremacist plots targeting energy systems “dramatically increased in frequency,” according to a study released in September by researchers at the Program on Extremism at George Washington University.
Over that period, 13 people associated with white supremacist movements were charged in federal courts with planning attacks on the energy sector, the study said, and 11 of those defendants were charged after 2020.
The study attributed the targeting of the energy sector to the rise of “accelerationism,” a term white supremacists have adopted to describe their desire to hasten the collapse of society.
“The goal is to create chaos, to spread confusion and damage systems that are vital to the U.S.,” said Ilana Krill, a research fellow at the Program on Extremism and a co-author of the study.
In February 2022, three men pleaded guilty to federal charges connected to a planned attack on substations after they had “conversations about how the possibility of the power being out for many months could cause war, even a race war, and induce the next Great Depression,” the Justice Department said.
That same month, a Department of Homeland Security bulletin warned that domestic violent extremists had recently aspired to disrupt electrical and communications systems as “a means to create chaos and advance ideological goals.”

Most-Likely: Penn State vs Alabama

Realistic Possibility: Penn State vs Tennessee

Sleeper Prediction: Penn State vs Texas

You can be sure the lefties in the USA never will admit this

Login to view embedded media

Login to view embedded media

An oldie, but goodie.

Login to view embedded media

Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont), chairman of the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, is “demanding answers” from the Biden Administration, adding that his committee will hold a hearing about the spy balloon.

“China's actions are a clear threat to those values and America's national security, and I'm demanding answers from the Biden Administration. I will be pulling people before my committee to get real answers on how this happened, and how we can prevent it from ever happening again,” Tester said.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/sarah...-chinese-spy-balloon-circling-the-us-n2619176

Much more here:

Retired Lt. Col. Daniel Davis...decorated combat vet...background in infantry and armor...interviewed by Breitbart.

A guy with no political ax to grind. He's simply looking from the perspective of national strategy and military tactics at what we're doing and where things are headed...and saying: this is insane.

There are uncanny parallels between the Regime's pandemic response and its Ukraine folly. In both cases, a disastrous policy is promoted by our rulers and their legions of experts, the media propaganda machine runs full throttle, dissent is shut down and dissenters demonized.

We're still picking up the pieces with regard to the pandemic as now, two years after the fact, the points made by the dissenters are vindicated while the Regime quietly tip-toes away from its horrible blunders. But at the rate we're going, tip-toeing away may not be an option in the case of Ukraine. I mean, you can only phuck with Lady Karma so long before she turns around and requires her due.

Anyway, below in italics are some excerpts of Davis's comments to Breitbart.

>>From someone who has done combat operations in tank-on-tank fights; in operations patrolling the East-West border during the Cold War and its potential Soviet invasions; and was the second-in-command of an armored cavalry squadron for the First Armored Division in the mid 2000s in Germany, I can tell you that just having NATO tanks does not equal battlefield success.

The problem is that what works on video games and on paper — you have to make it work on the ground. And very few people anywhere in the western media or anywhere in the other media, for that matter, understand how combat power is made. It’s not just the platform, though that is very important, but roughly 90 percent of the success is the people who operate the equipment.

...you have to have a trained platoon, platoons in a company; and a company in the battalion; and if you’re talking about the inner-level operations, battalions within brigades etc. You can’t send 500 [Ukrainian] dudes to Germany and conduct six weeks of maneuver training and think you’re going to get the same output, because those guys don’t have the experience. They don’t even have the baseline understanding that we had a whole career and our whole training before we even arrived at that one year preparation. I mean just on the surface of it, it's ridiculous...it’s people who just don’t have any idea of how actual combat power is generated that would believe that.

Because maybe it works for movies and in video games — just getting this capacity on your video game and poof, you’ve got the full capacity as though you were fully trained, but it just doesn’t work that way in reality...The expectation that so many in the West, and certainly those in Kyiv, have been professing: that they think the possession of these Bradleys, Abrams, Leopards, AMX-10, M109 Paladins, etc. combined, is going to allow them to go on a NATO-type offensive maneuver is just not going to happen because it’s way more than the platforms required to enable that kind of offensive operation.

All you’re doing is making Russia want to go to war. Far from wanting to deter Russia or making them hesitate and count the costs – it’s having the exact opposite effect across the board in Russia. If anything, it makes them want to be more aggressive. It makes them absolutely think we cannot lose this and double down on their efforts...even the general Russian population — you don’t see any protests anymore and you barely see any kind of negative social media comments, and that’s usually people who aren’t even in Russia. In Russia you don’t see any of that, because people are for the most part convinced that this is what has to be done because [they feel] it’s a very valid position to say all of NATO is against them.

We’re providing intelligence. We’re providing ammunition. We’re providing weapons systems [and] repair facilities, literally everything but the pull of the trigger. Imagine during the war with Afghanistan that Russia or China had just completely got behind the Taliban, gave them everything they had, including all their modern gear to kill American soldiers. Do you think we would have accepted that? Would we have been OK with that? We’d go crazy. We’d have potentially gone to war with them.

We think that, like Biden said hiding behind a fig leaf today, when he announced this change, that ‘we are not going to war with Russia’ and ‘we’re not a direct participant,’ as though just saying those words means anything to Russia...I think that there’s not enough recognition of just how much risk and gamble we’re taking right now...We have no strategy. Nobody is asking what comes next.

We're just giving all this stuff, nobody's talking about, not even ethereal kinds of overarching statements. What is this supposed to accomplish? What is the outcome you see by giving [these tanks]? What are you trying to produce on the ground? How is this going to benefit the United States of America as opposed to not doing it?

Define "win". Because you had the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff one week ago repeat what he’s been saying a lot, and one of the few things I agree with him on, [that] he sees no military path for Ukraine to win this war in the foreseeable future, meaning throughout the entire 2023...And he’s right. Even with all this stuff, of course, he knew what we were going to offer before he made that comment. And he’s right, but no one pays any attention to that, they just pretend it didn’t happen, [as if] he didn’t say it.

One of the things that’s been from the outset that it just has not come to grips within the West [is that] this is not Syria; this is not Iraq; this is not Libya; this is not Yemen; this is not even Iran. We have basically done whatever we wanted to do in all these places and didn’t even care about what they might do because we know they don’t have the ability...We’re having that same mentality in Russia...the biggest nuclear stockpile in the world. They can do something. The rules are different. You cannot behave and act...like you can against Syria.

I fear that one day, Russia’s going to say, ‘OK, you finally did cross a red line this time and we’re going to take action.' For example, [Russian Foreign Minister Sergey] Lavrov recently said that based on all this stuff about the tanks, they reserve the right to attack any provider of NATO gear, NATO tanks, NATO vehicles, their ammunition – no matter where they are, meaning Poland or in some other NATO country.

There is zero chance – and I mean zero – that Russia could ever militarily defeat NATO in a conventional sense. It’s a physical impossibility. They’re just struggling even now to defeat Ukrainians in part of the Donbas, their next-door neighbor, so they certainly couldn’t take on a 30 member NATO military alliance; they know that. So the only way they can defend against NATO, is through nuclear weapons, of course. So if we try to think we’re going to trigger Article 5 and not trigger nuclear war. I mean, we’re just insane and fooling ourselves.<<

What an historic event. Spawned careers, super groups, albums, movies, attempts to copy it, and countless children!

Disney piece says that slaves built America (white people had nothing to do with it) and that their descendants have "earned" reparations and continue to earn them. Tilled land from sea to sea to sea. (Am curious about slaves on West Coast) https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video...-the-proud-family-illuminati-new-world-order/

I am so sick and tired of hearing about how badly the dems have ruined America (which they have), I need something more positive and thought-provoking, preferably something completely unrelated to politics. Thanks in advance.

About time this corrupt POS gets investigated.

https://nypost.com/2023/02/05/house...-is-building-a-killer-case-against-joe-biden/

Comer is increasingly confident of his case, as whistleblowers come forward to the committee’s investigators from all aspects of the Biden family enterprises, and financial institutions. He says his investigators are examining the hitherto unexplored activities of Joe Biden’s brothers, Jim and Frank — and have witnesses willing to talk.

His initial focus has been to follow the money trail to see how it connects to the Chinese Communist Party. For that purpose, the committee will subpoena 13 banks, the majority of which have been fully cooperative.

Hunter’s high-priced lawyers have been sending letters to the banks warning them not to hand over information to Congress, which Comer says is “bulls–t. They don’t set the rules, Congress sets the rules.”

The poll also shows only 23% of U.S. adults say they have “a great deal” of confidence in Biden to effectively manage the White House. That has ticked down from 28% a year ago and remains significantly lower than 44% two years ago, just as Biden took office.

Just 21% have a lot of confidence in Biden’s ability to handle a crisis, down slightly from 26% last March.

Penn State makes FIRE's (Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) "10 Worst Colleges for Free Speech: 2023" list. This might be a good thing to mention the next time Penn State calls asking for money.

https://www.thefire.org/news/10-worst-colleges-free-speech-2023

How the hell does one steal 1.5 MM dollars worth of chicken wings?

https://www.kiro7.com/news/trending...s-school-district/KEZAL4GF3FCD3O5RW2WCH674AE/